MalwareTips News AV-Comparatives tests 19 antivirus products against 200 malicious links

Security Statistics and Reports
44 Replies 3,596 Views

What matters most to you when choosing antivirus software?

  • Strong malware blocking

    Votes: 30 66.7%
  • Few false alarms

    Votes: 1 2.2%
  • Low impact on PC speed

    Votes: 11 24.4%
  • Price and included features

    Votes: 2 4.4%
  • I am not sure

    Votes: 1 2.2%

  • Total voters
    45

News Now

Happening Now
Verified
Windows 11 users can now see interim results from AV-Comparatives’ July and August 2026 consumer antivirus testing. The independent lab tested 19 security products using 200 malicious web addresses, although full results and recommendations are not due until November.


Tests imitate everyday exposure​

AV-Comparatives says its automated test attempts to download and run live malware from the internet, mirroring common online activity. This checks the different protection layers that may stop a real infection.

Testing used fully updated 64-bit Windows 11 Pro systems with current third-party applications. The lab also assessed false positives—safe items incorrectly flagged as threats—to balance protection against accuracy.

Products included in the test​

The lineup covers free and paid products from major vendors, including Microsoft Defender, Avast, AVG, Bitdefender, ESET, Malwarebytes, McAfee and Norton.

  • Also tested: F-Secure, Fortect, G DATA, K7, Kaspersky and Panda.
  • The remaining products were Quick Heal, Sophos, Total Defense, TotalAV, Trend Micro and VIPRE.

What users should take from it​

The factsheet offers an early snapshot, not a final verdict. Protection rates may be updated on AV-Comparatives’ charts, while the complete results and product recommendations are scheduled for November.

If you are comparing products, consider both malware blocking and false positives. Existing users should keep Windows, antivirus software and other applications updated while waiting for the final report.
 
Windows 11 users can now see interim results from AV-Comparatives’ July and August 2026 consumer antivirus testing. The independent lab tested 19 security products using 200 malicious web addresses, although full results and recommendations are not due until November.


Tests imitate everyday exposure​

AV-Comparatives says its automated test attempts to download and run live malware from the internet, mirroring common online activity. This checks the different protection layers that may stop a real infection.

Testing used fully updated 64-bit Windows 11 Pro systems with current third-party applications. The lab also assessed false positives—safe items incorrectly flagged as threats—to balance protection against accuracy.

Products included in the test​

The lineup covers free and paid products from major vendors, including Microsoft Defender, Avast, AVG, Bitdefender, ESET, Malwarebytes, McAfee and Norton.

  • Also tested: F-Secure, Fortect, G DATA, K7, Kaspersky and Panda.
  • The remaining products were Quick Heal, Sophos, Total Defense, TotalAV, Trend Micro and VIPRE.

What users should take from it​

The factsheet offers an early snapshot, not a final verdict. Protection rates may be updated on AV-Comparatives’ charts, while the complete results and product recommendations are scheduled for November.

If you are comparing products, consider both malware blocking and false positives. Existing users should keep Windows, antivirus software and other applications updated while waiting for the final report.
on expected lines gen digital is winner, k and b a smidgen behind!
 

The percentage and the graph look worse than the actual number of missed samples.​

Ranked by fewest misses​

0 missed​

  • Avast
  • AVG
  • Norton
1 missed
  • Bitdefender
  • Kaspersky
  • McAfee
  • Total Defense
2 missed
  • F-Secure
  • G DATA
  • TotalAV
3 missed
  • ESET
5 missed
  • Fortect
6 missed
  • Malwarebytes
  • Sophos
  • VIPRE
7 missed
  • Trend Micro
8 missed
  • K7
9 missed
  • Microsoft
  • Panda
37 missed
  • Quick Heal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who would ditch MD for Avast now?

1789120177314.png
 
Trend is still on a couple of PC's I look after, an issue I found on a neighbours PC is not only does it have FP's as seen on this test but if its a blocked website the only way to clear it in any timely fashion is to reinstall the program, (am I incorrect here?) I found no way to remove notifications, false or not, maybe embarrassing if for example 'prettyladies+' site - I voted for FP's being an issue as for me I really don't like false positives.
 
This is outrageous!

What do you mean Kaspersky scored 99.8%??? I demand nothing but PERFECTION! I am uninstalling right now as I compose a lawsuit against the Russian company for this disgusting event. I didn't pay $13.99 for this!!
 
I’ve always noticed that Bitdefender and Malwarebytes tend to score much higher than Gen Digital’s products. However, I wonder if that’s partly because Bitdefender and Malwarebytes block more spam-related and nuisance websites, rather than simply detecting more genuinely malicious pages. Gen Digital seems to prioritize minimizing false positives, while Bitdefender and Malwarebytes take a more aggressive approach to filtering out spam, annoying websites, and other potentially unwanted content. Gen Digital doesn’t seem to place as much emphasis on blocking spammy or nuisance websites, focusing more on actual malicious threats.

When ever i test these products in my junk email folder the nasty porno advertisements usually go past Gendigital. but products like Bitdefender and Malwarebytes will block em out. Gendigital apparently likes to have people a little excitement in their lives.
 
Last edited:

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

You may also like...

Continue exploring the conversation.

Back
Top