There is no option to upload files in messages.
The obfuscated code is in the replies of the Reddit post.
I only copied the code and pasted in notepad and saved as cmd file.
AVG vs Symantec Antivirus: This One Cleaned Better
- Thread starter Khushal
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
The obfuscated code is in the replies of the Reddit post.
I only copied the code and pasted in notepad and saved as cmd file.
Symantec is back; looks was having a nap
Now 3 detections
Symantec Endpoint Protection Client 14.4.115 RU10 / 14.3 – FR / EN
Télécharger l'antivirus Symantec pour protéger Windows des Malwares.
detovirus.blogspot.com
A malicious code of classic clickfix attack, copied and pasted into notepad, saved as cmd file, checked by VT: only Symantec could detect.
View attachment 295197
K7 now join the list VirusTotal
One more clickfix script detected by Symantec endpoint protection; it's getting real good with scripts, contrary to its reputation.
One more clickfix script detected by Symantec endpoint protection; it's getting real good with scripts, contrary to its reputation.
View attachment 295328
One more clickfix script detected by Symantec endpoint protection; it's getting real good with scripts, contrary to its reputation.
View attachment 295328
submit to k?
The previous one was added to K on VT after submitting it on K portal.
Let K do its research
F
ForgottenSeer 114717
When it comes to cleaning a system that is already infected, the two brands have different philosophies and results. Historically, Symantec (now Norton 360) has a stronger reputation for deep remediation, while AVG excels at lightweight, preventative scanning.
As of 2026, here is how they compare in a "cleanup" scenario:
As of 2026, here is how they compare in a "cleanup" scenario:
1. Remediation Capability (Cleaning the Mess)
- Symantec (Norton 360): Norton is generally considered the better choice for an infected system. It includes a 100% Virus Protection Promise, which means if their software can’t remove a virus, a Norton expert will remote into your machine to do it for you. Their engine is designed to handle "stubborn" malware that tries to block antivirus installation.
- AVG: While AVG has excellent detection rates (often 100% in lab tests), it sometimes struggles with the "aftermath" of an infection—such as repairing corrupted system files or removing every last registry trace left by sophisticated Trojans.
2. Advanced Recovery Tools
- Symantec (Norton 360): Norton uses an "aggressive" scanning mode and previously offered the standalone Power Eraser (now integrated) specifically for threats that traditional scans miss. It is very effective at "breaking" the hold that rootkits have on a system during boot-up.
- AVG: AVG’s strength is its Boot-Time Scan. This allows the software to scan your computer before the Windows operating system (and any malware) fully loads, which is a highly effective way to delete persistent viruses that "lock" themselves once Windows is running.
3. Performance & Ease of Use
| Feature | Norton (Symantec) | AVG |
| Cleanup Success | High (Includes Expert Help) | Good (Best via Boot-Scan) |
| Repairing OS Files | Very Good | Average |
| User Intervention | Automated & Hands-off | Requires more manual setup |
The Verdict: Which should you choose?
- Choose Symantec (Norton) if the infection is severe, the computer is barely usable, or you want the peace of mind of having a human expert "on call" to finish the job.
- Choose AVG if you want a free or low-cost tool to run a Boot-Time Scan, which is often the "silver bullet" for removing common malware that hides in the background.
- Apr 28, 2015
- 9,498
- 1
- 85,713
- 8,389
K7 is improving.
Good one!
I think they are copying from Kaspersky.
The previous sample was first detected by Symantec also.
Then I submitted to Kaspersky; it was detected, than added to VT.
Later QuickHeal detected it also on VT.
typical indian mindset of copying russians as they have done in defense.
Last edited by a moderator:
and Chinese copying the American IOS in Xiaomi MIUI, then HyperOS later.
Norton too; you have to check it separately, as they are not contributing to VT URL check.
Eset still not detecting it and their results reflect on VT but just wanted to double check.
You may also like...
-
Symantec Endpoint Protection 2026- Started by Shadowra
- Replies: 17
-
-
Kaspersky Premium vs McAfee Advanced
- Started by Shadowra
- Replies: 87
-
Battle: Bitdefender Free Antivirus vs AVG Free Antivirus | Test and Review | 2025- Started by NB InfoTech
- Replies: 1
-
AVG Antivirus – Solid Free Option or Premium Upsell Trap?- Started by Bot
- Replies: 1