You could basically pair anything with VoodooShield, even if Avira goes downhill, and it’ll be fine.Don't know if now the right time is to choose Avira:
German security firm Avira has been acquired by Investcorp at a $180M valuation | TechCrunch
Mergers and acquisitions largely grinded to a halt at the end of March, in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic spreading around the world, but todaytechcrunch.com
What is the problem about investop and avira? i don,t get itDon't know if now the right time is to choose Avira:
German security firm Avira has been acquired by Investcorp at a $180M valuation | TechCrunch
Mergers and acquisitions largely grinded to a halt at the end of March, in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic spreading around the world, but today
The problem is that we don't know what this will do for Avira.
okey, new things to think about. thank you for clearing it for me
You're right. I tried it for quite some time. The results I had were not bad. If you installed it without bloadware is very light program.For older computers and laptops it is perfect. Have every two hours update , and works perfect without problems on ram and cpu. Against virus samples it's pretty good. But against ransomware is poor the protection. But combo with VS is realy unbeatable
I tested Avira last year in the Hub...
malwaretips.com
At least on my system, Bitdefender seems lighter than Kaspersky on everyday usage but indeed consumes more RAM.
this means little to me in a comparison, unless you give me the ram used by avira on your system as well - so i can compare themhey
Avira free vs Bitdefender free edition 2020 in terms of protection and overall performance ?
in my system bitdefender eats nearly 400mb ram all the time!
Have nice day
it's been a long time since i tried avira, but i recall i abandoned it because it wouldn't let me install "other" supplementary security programs, such as voodoo shield. does avira allow this now? bitdefender can be a jerk in this regards as well, heheh, but was more liberal than avira.Voodoo shield is a very good choice.
As long as you can stand a few alerts.
the comment i replied to (seemed to me) to be vague (and i may have misinterpreted its intention do to that nebulousness), but it gave the insinuation that one product was better than the other based on personal ram usage, yet it did not explicitly state this (hence my query). i took his comment to mean that he had already done the comparison and had simply forgotten to mention avira's ram usage (opting instead to only mention the winner by pointing out the losers large ram usage). yet i may have misread him, and he may have only been posting bitdefender's ram (on his system) in the hopes that others would post their ram usage for comparison. if the former, one is saying a product is better than the other without offering the proof. if the latter, one is not stating bias, but instead contributing data that would be compiled (in this thread) with other user data to compare and discern which product was superior (based on that particular metric).Curious. Why not do the testing yourself ?
Avira free with syshardener and Bitdefender traficlight is enough safe if you are not happy clicker. Is very light if you install it without bloadware.this means little to me in a comparison, unless you give me the ram used by avira on your system as well - so i can compare them
it's been a long time since i tried avira, but i recall i abandoned it because it wouldn't let me install "other" supplementary security programs, such as voodoo shield. does avira allow this now? bitdefender can be a jerk in this regards as well, heheh, but was more liberal than avira.
