Battle Avira or Panda Cloud against Zero-day & Exploits

[Ink]

bitbizket asked:

Just a question for you guys which of these two is better with zero days & exploits?
Avira or Panda Cloud?

 

[GabiCRX]

I think that Avira is better !

 

[win7holic]

Avira more better. Avira have a good web protection and about detection when Offline mode (no internet connection)
panda better if you always connected on internet. if NOT, it not good at all.

 

[WinAndLinuxTutorials]

Avira more better. Avira have a good web protection and about detection when Offline mode (no internet connection)
panda better if you always connected on internet. if NOT, it not good at all.

You are totally right!

---

Avira is better.

 

[Deleted member 178]

none of them, CIS rules

 

[win7holic]

but, CIS can't be use for ALL computer users.
it's difficult to setting, something get confusing for novice users.
avira has better solution, between web protection and AV engine for detection work flawless.

 

[WinAndLinuxTutorials]

none of them, CIS rules

Users who know how to use CIS can use it It's a bit confusing for me.

 

[HeffeD]

Users who know how to use CIS can use it It's a bit confusing for me.

It may seem a bit daunting at first, but it's really not that difficult to figure out. It's like anything really. The more you use it, the better you understand it.

 

[jamescv7]

Panda Cloud has improved their detection especially with Online Cloud database but the drawback was offline which it could be less effective than online one.

Avira was known even before for up to date with latest threats thru signatures.

 

[Ink]

none of them, CIS rules

This doesn't answer the OP (bitbizket) question does it. Unless you could explain why?

 

[Deleted member 178]

i meant CIS AV now is more than correct, CIS becomes user friendly (my gf has never had usability issues since the v5.8), and you have the best of both world (classic offline signature + cloud). and i dont talk about D+.