Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
AVs without HTTPS interception/filtering + browser extensions
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 1007683" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>Yeah, Bitdefender is fast because they don't do HTTPS scanning on many sites. Website wise or certificate wise, they have a large whitelist. These are sites that they are probably confident of not having any malicious contents. So that's why browsing is very fast. Avast & ESET are the fastest in my experience on sites where they perform HTTPS scanning and also lower CPU usage.</p><p>About F-Secure, I found browsing to be very fast when I tried it, but I saw a couple of users who had issues with browsing speed. Can't really tell about website blocking as I never used it for too long because it gives me some other problems. F-Secure's super slow response to user submission is a major problem indeed. I don't remember receiving a response from them in less than 7 days, which is already too long if it's a false positive. 20 days is extreme. </p><p>Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Norton and Microsoft are very fast at fixing false positives in my experience. Microsoft is fast 7 days a week, while the other four I mentioned won't be responsive during weekends.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 1007683, member: 78686"] Yeah, Bitdefender is fast because they don't do HTTPS scanning on many sites. Website wise or certificate wise, they have a large whitelist. These are sites that they are probably confident of not having any malicious contents. So that's why browsing is very fast. Avast & ESET are the fastest in my experience on sites where they perform HTTPS scanning and also lower CPU usage. About F-Secure, I found browsing to be very fast when I tried it, but I saw a couple of users who had issues with browsing speed. Can't really tell about website blocking as I never used it for too long because it gives me some other problems. F-Secure's super slow response to user submission is a major problem indeed. I don't remember receiving a response from them in less than 7 days, which is already too long if it's a false positive. 20 days is extreme. Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Norton and Microsoft are very fast at fixing false positives in my experience. Microsoft is fast 7 days a week, while the other four I mentioned won't be responsive during weekends. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top