Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1121571" data-attributes="member: 121355">I agree with that. I&#039;ve already written that a few times <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> An AV manufacturer that has a brand built on the market will not risk participating in a test where you can be compromised. Marketing-wise, because it cost him a lot.Ok. But if you look at the table, Eset has the maximum number of stars in all tests.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/avc_sum_2024_levels-600x248.png[/URL]Besides, the tests were not every month. And what&#039;s more - the tests ended before Eset v18. And despite numerous critical remarks about Eset v17 regarding Real-World Protection (that it is weak), it still won the bronze medal. And Kasperky, which is considered by many to be number 1 in this field, does not have any medal. The same Avast/AVG clone called Norton does not appear in the main awards. Surprisingly, with its poorly rated cloud (Sentra), Avira also has a gold medal in Real-World Protection <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/summary-report-2024/[/URL]To end this thread, for years this trio has always been mentioned as the best - Kaspersky, Bitdefender and Eset <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />I do not know Adrian personally. I do not participate in the forum. I have simply known the AvLab portal for many years. I know when this portal was still in its infancy. I know it before Adrian started playing with tests <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1121571, member: 121355"] I agree with that. I've already written that a few times ;) An AV manufacturer that has a brand built on the market will not risk participating in a test where you can be compromised. Marketing-wise, because it cost him a lot. Ok. But if you look at the table, Eset has the maximum number of stars in all tests. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/avc_sum_2024_levels-600x248.png[/URL] Besides, the tests were not every month. And what's more - the tests ended before Eset v18. And despite numerous critical remarks about Eset v17 regarding Real-World Protection (that it is weak), it still won the bronze medal. And Kasperky, which is considered by many to be number 1 in this field, does not have any medal. The same Avast/AVG clone called Norton does not appear in the main awards. Surprisingly, with its poorly rated cloud (Sentra), Avira also has a gold medal in Real-World Protection :D [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/summary-report-2024/[/URL] To end this thread, for years this trio has always been mentioned as the best - Kaspersky, Bitdefender and Eset ;) I do not know Adrian personally. I do not participate in the forum. I have simply known the AvLab portal for many years. I know when this portal was still in its infancy. I know it before Adrian started playing with tests ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification