Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1121893" data-attributes="member: 121355">1. Browsing protection works as if I had the Traffic plugin installed. So the question is why the search assistant doesn&#039;t work. I asked the question on the BD forum.2. I know about these functions. I don&#039;t want to help it. Let it quickly adapt to my computer. I&#039;ll turn it off later.3. The question went to the BD forum. I&#039;m waiting4. Ok. ThxDoesn&#039;t work. Changing the settings doesn&#039;t change anything.More information9. BD takes about 1.1GB of RAM when idle. 14 running processes (data according to Process Explorer). CPU below 1%, usually no more than 0.5%. Less disk usage than Eset during scanning. On BD disk it takes 2.3GB (according to WizTree).10. First full system scan - over 55min. After 2h scan less than 6min. Photon does its job.1. It downloads files much faster through the browser than Eset. It doesn&#039;t &quot;freeze&quot; them like Eset and you can use them right away.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1121893, member: 121355"] 1. Browsing protection works as if I had the Traffic plugin installed. So the question is why the search assistant doesn't work. I asked the question on the BD forum. 2. I know about these functions. I don't want to help it. Let it quickly adapt to my computer. I'll turn it off later. 3. The question went to the BD forum. I'm waiting 4. Ok. Thx Doesn't work. Changing the settings doesn't change anything. More information 9. BD takes about 1.1GB of RAM when idle. 14 running processes (data according to Process Explorer). CPU below 1%, usually no more than 0.5%. Less disk usage than Eset during scanning. On BD disk it takes 2.3GB (according to WizTree). 10. First full system scan - over 55min. After 2h scan less than 6min. Photon does its job. 1. It downloads files much faster through the browser than Eset. It doesn't "freeze" them like Eset and you can use them right away. [/QUOTE]

Verification