Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Bitdefender Total Security 2020 vs Ransominator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacDefender" data-source="post: 877089" data-attributes="member: 83059"><p>Loll indeed! That is one of my pet peeves.</p><p></p><p>I really respected the responses I got back from Fabian (Emsisoft), F-Secure, and WiseVector when we talked about this 7zip exploit.</p><p></p><p>GREAT response: WiseVector:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Acceptable/Respectable responses:</p><p>F-Secure:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Emsisoft in other thread, paraphrased as "We consider once ransomware makes it onto a device, it can already be compromised in many ways. What you're seeing is reflective of the shift in focus to preventing host compromise as opposed to behavior blocking a malicious binary already on-host". <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/emsisoft-anti-malware-default-vs-ransominator.100380/post-876905" target="_blank">Video - Emsisoft Anti Malware (default) vs Ransominator</a></p><p></p><p>I don't mind if a vendor's choice is to explain why they're not taking any action for this proof of concept. I think those are good answers from all 3 vendors for their justification.</p><p></p><p>The most disappointing answers were the ones from ESET which said their product would react to real ransomware, this is not real ransomware, and if you write real ransomware, that's illegal/unethical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacDefender, post: 877089, member: 83059"] Loll indeed! That is one of my pet peeves. I really respected the responses I got back from Fabian (Emsisoft), F-Secure, and WiseVector when we talked about this 7zip exploit. GREAT response: WiseVector: Acceptable/Respectable responses: F-Secure: Emsisoft in other thread, paraphrased as "We consider once ransomware makes it onto a device, it can already be compromised in many ways. What you're seeing is reflective of the shift in focus to preventing host compromise as opposed to behavior blocking a malicious binary already on-host". [URL="https://malwaretips.com/threads/emsisoft-anti-malware-default-vs-ransominator.100380/post-876905"]Video - Emsisoft Anti Malware (default) vs Ransominator[/URL] I don't mind if a vendor's choice is to explain why they're not taking any action for this proof of concept. I think those are good answers from all 3 vendors for their justification. The most disappointing answers were the ones from ESET which said their product would react to real ransomware, this is not real ransomware, and if you write real ransomware, that's illegal/unethical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top