Can you name the attack that your improved sandbox could prevent, while my default couldn't? Any real-world scenario and not something produced in the lab? I'd genuinely like to know the difference.The level?
It’s the sandbox protection that’s extended to areas not covered by default.
It doesn’t make anything worse.
In fact, it improves security.
On the contrary, my sandbox settings actually improve resistance to browser vulnerabilities that can be exploited remotely.
So, ultimately, they improve resistance to malware capable of exploiting certain sandbox escapes.
Changing the sandbox settings also has its effects on performance. For me personally, it isn't worth trading performance over improved sandbox due to how exceptionally rare these attacks are. I think it's more likely for me to win a lottery that to stumble upon malicious website that has ability to escape browser sandbox.
I want to remind you that the purpose of sandbox in the web browser isn't protection from malware rather to isolate tabs so websites can't access your OS or other tabs.
I'm not sure I understand, what isn't possible? Just add Italian filter list to Brave and your regional websites are covered too. Brave along with its ad blocker is way more optimized on Android than Firefox and uBlock Origin.It's impossible for you to do that, even if you use 400,000 rules in your filters list,especially on websites in your language,as I explained in my previous post.
Have a nice day.
I tried both and battery lasts far longer with Brave than with Firefox + uBlock Origin combo. That's why I can't replace it with anything else, because better solution still doesn't exist. It's strange to me that you use Firefox on Android, when Chromium browsers are superior in every single way on the platform.
You too have a nice day!

