Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wat0114" data-source="post: 1099670" data-attributes="member: 91306"><p>Layoffs always amount to a an infamous buzzword : &quot;we can do more with less&quot; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> Where I work the department had ~ 45 employees in 1998, whittled down over the years to less than half that, even though our workload only only decreased by maybe 15% maximum. Ultimately contributing in no small part to the lining of the pockets of the CEO and the top 5 VP&#039;s to the tune of over $75,000,000 each year. No lying and no exaggeration. Of course we are always told to cut back on our spending and cut costs everywhere we can. We need to tighten our belts <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="wat0114, post: 1099670, member: 91306"] Layoffs always amount to a an infamous buzzword : "we can do more with less" :D Where I work the department had ~ 45 employees in 1998, whittled down over the years to less than half that, even though our workload only only decreased by maybe 15% maximum. Ultimately contributing in no small part to the lining of the pockets of the CEO and the top 5 VP's to the tune of over $75,000,000 each year. No lying and no exaggeration. Of course we are always told to cut back on our spending and cut costs everywhere we can. We need to tighten our belts :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]

Verification