Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
ESET
Can one buy a single seat eset blade lic?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cartaphilus" data-source="post: 1110525" data-attributes="member: 99742"><p>Harmony great detection; more FP and heavier on resources, standalone. Heaviest and very noticable resource impact when opening new files or loading webpages that are rich in input fields (like forms etc). Heavier than DI + Windows defender and Cylance+ESET Home. </p><p></p><p>Deep instinct good detection, some FP, resource impact not noticable but I am running it along with Windows defender</p><p></p><p>Bitdefender detection between DI and Harmony and the space is very tight so not much room and difference between them. False positive rate I would say equal to DI or a tad more, but nothing to write home about if you know what subsequent steps to take in order to verify validity of the file. Stand alone</p><p></p><p>Cylance worst of them all in terms of detection, running along side of ESET home just for memes. Some pact on resources but it doesn't find anything that ESET doesn't and it misses what ESET finds. Not recommended.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But I am not really malware hunting. The width and breath of my malware hunting playground is cracks, not because I use pirated software but because it's rich with malware aimed towards the "PcMasterRace"/geeks. So none of it is aimed at corporate espionage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cartaphilus, post: 1110525, member: 99742"] Harmony great detection; more FP and heavier on resources, standalone. Heaviest and very noticable resource impact when opening new files or loading webpages that are rich in input fields (like forms etc). Heavier than DI + Windows defender and Cylance+ESET Home. Deep instinct good detection, some FP, resource impact not noticable but I am running it along with Windows defender Bitdefender detection between DI and Harmony and the space is very tight so not much room and difference between them. False positive rate I would say equal to DI or a tad more, but nothing to write home about if you know what subsequent steps to take in order to verify validity of the file. Stand alone Cylance worst of them all in terms of detection, running along side of ESET home just for memes. Some pact on resources but it doesn't find anything that ESET doesn't and it misses what ESET finds. Not recommended. But I am not really malware hunting. The width and breath of my malware hunting playground is cracks, not because I use pirated software but because it's rich with malware aimed towards the "PcMasterRace"/geeks. So none of it is aimed at corporate espionage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top