Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1122277" data-attributes="member: 121355">Sure, it checks but doesn&#039;t download. But BD is different. Since I&#039;ve had it, it can download updates once every 6 hours and sometimes every 2 hours and sometimes every 1 hour. Now I&#039;ve set it to 3 hours.Eset is similar. It asks every 1 hour and can also download every hour and sometimes only 2 times during the whole day.WOW. So BD is defending it a bit. We criticized it a bit, but as you can see, it&#039;s not the only one who does this. I didn&#039;t notice it. Apart from the fact that my free space fluctuated a lot. Now I don&#039;t have it with BD. It is almost not noticeable.(you can only see when BD downloads the database)Which doesn&#039;t change the fact that Eset asks every hour and can download every hour. You can set it in BD.Anyway, BD supposedly takes up so much RAM (more when idle than Eset during scanning) but there is no difference in the operation of the computer at all. I feel the same when working on the computer as with the &quot;light&quot; Eset. On the other hand... pages as I wrote (browsing the internet goes just as fast) in both cases, but when it comes to reacting to &quot;bad pages&quot; I have to admit that Eset was a bit faster.Exactly... Why does BD take so long to update? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /> As you can see, the amount of data is similar to Eset. Eset does it instantly and in the case of BD you can go and make yourself a coffee <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1122277, member: 121355"] Sure, it checks but doesn't download. But BD is different. Since I've had it, it can download updates once every 6 hours and sometimes every 2 hours and sometimes every 1 hour. Now I've set it to 3 hours. Eset is similar. It asks every 1 hour and can also download every hour and sometimes only 2 times during the whole day. WOW. So BD is defending it a bit. We criticized it a bit, but as you can see, it's not the only one who does this. I didn't notice it. Apart from the fact that my free space fluctuated a lot. Now I don't have it with BD. It is almost not noticeable.(you can only see when BD downloads the database) Which doesn't change the fact that Eset asks every hour and can download every hour. You can set it in BD. Anyway, BD supposedly takes up so much RAM (more when idle than Eset during scanning) but there is no difference in the operation of the computer at all. I feel the same when working on the computer as with the "light" Eset. On the other hand... pages as I wrote (browsing the internet goes just as fast) in both cases, but when it comes to reacting to "bad pages" I have to admit that Eset was a bit faster. Exactly... Why does BD take so long to update? :unsure: As you can see, the amount of data is similar to Eset. Eset does it instantly and in the case of BD you can go and make yourself a coffee ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification