Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1097856" data-attributes="member: 99014">But per the information in this test (which once again, was brought by the Comodo fanboys, not by me), Comodo is still rock bottom:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">McAfee blocked much more malware in pre-execution stage (which is always better), with 0 tweaks. The so-called dwell time (on the test listed as reaction time) was 2 seconds</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Kaspersky had even lower dwell time than McAfee, still blocking the same 98.91% malware pre-execution</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bitdefender blocked 99.27% pre-execution with &lt;1 sec dwell time.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mediocre solutions like Panda, also available for free, still did better. 86.18% pre-execution detection and 27.6 sec dwell time.</li>
</ul>Comodo, despite achieving the same protection level, blocked merely 36% pre-execution and had over a minute dwell time.So even on a test where everyone gets 100% score, Comodo still comes down at the bottom. The only product worse than Comodo is Xcitium, blocking 3% malware in pre-execution phase, which is the lowest.In conclusion, other products deliver the same prevention, with far quicker reaction times and block malware way earlier in its lifecycle.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1097856, member: 99014"] But per the information in this test (which once again, was brought by the Comodo fanboys, not by me), Comodo is still rock bottom: [LIST] [*]McAfee blocked much more malware in pre-execution stage (which is always better), with 0 tweaks. The so-called dwell time (on the test listed as reaction time) was 2 seconds [*]Kaspersky had even lower dwell time than McAfee, still blocking the same 98.91% malware pre-execution [*]Bitdefender blocked 99.27% pre-execution with <1 sec dwell time. [*]Mediocre solutions like Panda, also available for free, still did better. 86.18% pre-execution detection and 27.6 sec dwell time. [/LIST] Comodo, despite achieving the same protection level, blocked merely 36% pre-execution and had over a minute dwell time. So even on a test where everyone gets 100% score, Comodo still comes down at the bottom. The only product worse than Comodo is Xcitium, blocking 3% malware in pre-execution phase, which is the lowest. In conclusion, other products deliver the same prevention, with far quicker reaction times and block malware way earlier in its lifecycle. [/QUOTE]

Verification