Why would anyone install Norton on an XP machine when Comodo Firewall would a better job without any need for updates et al ?
According to these labs everyone performed well, but solutions were called “oblivious to malware” by experts here. So who do we trust, the lab that specialises in use-case scenarios or the experts?
Not sure what the incorrect things are.
Abandonware? You must have been living under a rock for years.
That's the Comodo style.
You hereby agree that staff on Comodo forum is fooling people on the their forum with promises to improve CIS by resolving more that one or two bugs out of 500 or so?
That's a typical social media move to "re-smith" my words to say something that I did not say. Nice try, but it's not going to work.
The "reviews" that I have seen Decopi post have been nothing more than personal opinion posts on websites that provide good reviews only by software publishers that pay.
@Adrian Ścibor at AVLab.pl is a leading industry expert, and a very well respected one on that. His advanced tests are the only ones of their kind in the industry. He does not do them very often because he does not charge the software publisher for the testing. He only charges them if they want the test detail reports.
Nobody has ever supplied an in-the-wild malware that bypasses Comodo's containment whereas thousands of malware have bypassed Avast, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Norton, etc.
avlab.pl
@Adrian Ścibor configures the test systems with various tools to monitor for any changes on the OS. So if during the "dwell time" the malware was making serious malicious changes to the OS outside of Comodo's containment then he would have reported it.
Everybody knows Comodo has bugs. That does not mean it is a terrible software. Software intrinsically has bugs. So the complaints about Comodo's bugs are vastly overstated.
Nobody here is promoting nor defending Comodo "til death do they part."
@Behold Eck Please keep it up. You save me alot of money.
You are a clown start working in a circus.
Sure, just let me know when you`re seated comfortably with the popcorn in easy reach.
The attacks on her are more about jealousy. She has followers.. That position may be sprinkled with a little sexism. A woman dares challenge we self proclaimed experts? How dare she!!
Really? Harm a person's online privacy whenever everybody knows there is no such thing as online privacy, even when using a VPN, Proxy, or IP Revolver.
I saw the list of reported bugs. All software has bugs. So what? There is a long history of capable users here at MT finding workarounds to the Comodo bugs.
Good questions. I think I have one answer. They know best, and we should be obedient and do as they say. That's the impression I get, anyway.
Nobody calls them “misleading to piblic”. But there is a slight conflict between
And the lab test result, isn’t there?
You just love dancing around questions with long, unrelated posts.
Decopi and Pico are both on public record here at MT stating that Comodo, and in the case of Decopi, that @cruelsister and the "Comodo fanatics irresponsibly and immorally mislead the public."
I never said that Comodo, or any AV for that matter is "oblivious" to malware.
No. Nobody needs to choose. @cruelsister 's videos are valid. So are Leo's PC Security Channel assessments and reviews. Next there are many tests of Comodo going back all the way to the 2010 era that were credible, performed meticulously by industry experts, and they showed that Comodo achieved the stated primary goal of any antivirus - to keep the system clean and protect the integrity of the data on the system.
