Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1100162" data-attributes="member: 114717">That is a sweeping generalization infused with copious amounts of speculation to the extent that it just ain&#039;t true.They do understand. And they agree with you. All they are doing is saying &quot;I (we) do not experience the bugs and it works for me (us).&quot; They admit that Comodo has bugs and issues. It is software. They understand software. There is a way around the bugs and issues. It is CS configuration.None of them are saying &quot;Comodo is the greatest, most powerful security software in the universe and every person on Earth needs to use it!&quot; All they are saying is &quot;It works for me, and therefore I use it.&quot;The problem over-and-over again with you is you take a simple post made by people like [USER=75774]@Chuck57[/USER] , [USER=24044]@Behold Eck[/USER], [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and others - deliberately twist it using your own agenda words and mis-characterize\mis-categorize their posts and usage of Comodo as &quot;irresponsible and immoral&quot; fanatics.[USER=75774]@Chuck57[/USER] , [USER=24044]@Behold Eck[/USER] , [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] , and others all know and agree that people encounter bugs and other issues. They also agree that others can experience serious problems with Comodo. At the same time they are capable of making Comodo work successfully for them. That in no way makes them fanatics.Stating &quot;It works for me&quot; does not make anybody a fanatic.It is weird that you use every opportunity to rage against Comodo by twisting others&#039; posts. Even when others agree with you - but using words and phrases that you deliberately ignore what they posted - and automatically default to &quot;You are an irresponsible and immoral Comodo fanatic.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1100162, member: 114717"] That is a sweeping generalization infused with copious amounts of speculation to the extent that it just ain't true. They do understand. And they agree with you. All they are doing is saying "I (we) do not experience the bugs and it works for me (us)." They admit that Comodo has bugs and issues. It is software. They understand software. There is a way around the bugs and issues. It is CS configuration. None of them are saying "Comodo is the greatest, most powerful security software in the universe and every person on Earth needs to use it!" All they are saying is "It works for me, and therefore I use it." The problem over-and-over again with you is you take a simple post made by people like [USER=75774]@Chuck57[/USER] , [USER=24044]@Behold Eck[/USER], [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and others - deliberately twist it using your own agenda words and mis-characterize\mis-categorize their posts and usage of Comodo as "irresponsible and immoral" fanatics. [USER=75774]@Chuck57[/USER] , [USER=24044]@Behold Eck[/USER] , [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] , and others all know and agree that people encounter bugs and other issues. They also agree that others can experience serious problems with Comodo. At the same time they are capable of making Comodo work successfully for them. That in no way makes them fanatics. Stating "It works for me" does not make anybody a fanatic. It is weird that you use every opportunity to rage against Comodo by twisting others' posts. Even when others agree with you - but using words and phrases that you deliberately ignore what they posted - and automatically default to "You are an irresponsible and immoral Comodo fanatic." [/QUOTE]

Verification