Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1100276" data-attributes="member: 99014">There are generic disclaimers placed on top of various sections, which clearly state that certain content should be taken with a grain of salt.Nevertheless, statements are made, then people turn around and contradict themselves. This is how it always goes on every Comodo thread.First, it’s stated that it performs better than everyone else. Then, as “evidence”, sort of like we are in court, some tests are being waved and published. According to the same tests deposited as evidence, again, not by me, Comodo has the same, if not worse performance than everyone else.Then people turn around and say “I never said it was better” but simultaneously, continue to state that malware bypasses other AVs and Comodo is “unbeatable”.It’s a lot of contradictions, although some of their statements, for example the revenue required to implement improvements, are right on point</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1100276, member: 99014"] There are generic disclaimers placed on top of various sections, which clearly state that certain content should be taken with a grain of salt. Nevertheless, statements are made, then people turn around and contradict themselves. This is how it always goes on every Comodo thread. First, it’s stated that it performs better than everyone else. Then, as “evidence”, sort of like we are in court, some tests are being waved and published. According to the same tests deposited as evidence, again, not by me, Comodo has the same, if not worse performance than everyone else. Then people turn around and say “I never said it was better” but simultaneously, continue to state that malware bypasses other AVs and Comodo is “unbeatable”. It’s a lot of contradictions, although some of their statements, for example the revenue required to implement improvements, are right on point [/QUOTE]

Verification