Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo CIS Bug fix policy
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Divine_Barakah" data-source="post: 1100339" data-attributes="member: 79770"><p>What do most vendors do in case of a piece of mal ware that was detected by BB? Some vendors such as Kasperskg will generate a detection UDS until a signature is added for it. This is done to help protect users in the fastest manner possible. If signatures are obselete, then why top vendors still partly rely on signatures on 2024?</p><p></p><p>I know signatures alone are not enough and should be complemented by other modules, but it is the first line of defense and is doing its job.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Divine_Barakah, post: 1100339, member: 79770"] What do most vendors do in case of a piece of mal ware that was detected by BB? Some vendors such as Kasperskg will generate a detection UDS until a signature is added for it. This is done to help protect users in the fastest manner possible. If signatures are obselete, then why top vendors still partly rely on signatures on 2024? I know signatures alone are not enough and should be complemented by other modules, but it is the first line of defense and is doing its job. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
