Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Divine_Barakah" data-source="post: 1100345" data-attributes="member: 79770">And in the case of Comodo, some users blindly trust it based on some videos. They blindly recommended it and never be objective about it. Personally when I choose a security product and pay for it, then I own it not the other way around. I share my experience both the good and bad without forcefully pushing my experience or turn a blind eye on its issues and bugs. I do not need to deal with issues and bugs when I can choose another solution. I am using Emsisoft and I was annoyed with it generating FPs. I did not blindly defend it as others do with Comodo. I do not see it other than being a fanboy if you do it. In the same way, other whined for years and discarded many tests in which Web root failed and they demanded the change of scope and methodology of tests to satisfy their fanboyism. The very same is done in Comodo. If you test it on default settings with it nonexistent web protection and very bad antivirus engine, the test will be discarded and disregarded, but when you test Kasperskg and configure it to the optimal shape making use of its very powerful components the test would be unrealistic? This is just absurd.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Divine_Barakah, post: 1100345, member: 79770"] And in the case of Comodo, some users blindly trust it based on some videos. They blindly recommended it and never be objective about it. Personally when I choose a security product and pay for it, then I own it not the other way around. I share my experience both the good and bad without forcefully pushing my experience or turn a blind eye on its issues and bugs. I do not need to deal with issues and bugs when I can choose another solution. I am using Emsisoft and I was annoyed with it generating FPs. I did not blindly defend it as others do with Comodo. I do not see it other than being a fanboy if you do it. In the same way, other whined for years and discarded many tests in which Web root failed and they demanded the change of scope and methodology of tests to satisfy their fanboyism. The very same is done in Comodo. If you test it on default settings with it nonexistent web protection and very bad antivirus engine, the test will be discarded and disregarded, but when you test Kasperskg and configure it to the optimal shape making use of its very powerful components the test would be unrealistic? This is just absurd. [/QUOTE]

Verification