Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo CIS Bug fix policy
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1100357" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>Your posts came all at once and it is a hell to even follow up, so some will probably remain unread, this is due to moderation and not my fault, I will read and reply to whatever I can.</p><p></p><p>Norton is highly recommended and does a better job, on the Neil Rubenking tests, it has never missed thousands of malware samples on any test, in fact, Norton is consistently demonstrated to be top performer. </p><p></p><p>The Norton technology is governed by over 2500 patents which serve as a statement of Norton (and Symantec) R&D effort.</p><p></p><p>If you wanna argue, show me a test where Norton did not get excellent scores. Comodo will not reach the Norton technological excellence even if everyone from Gen Digital goes on a 5-year holiday and Comodo decides to finally invest. Comparing Norton (and others that you mentioned there) with Comodo is hilarious at most.</p><p></p><p>Now your other comment, that you did not say it was “unbeatable” from one of your accounts (they are just so many), I believe it was Kaylin or something like that, you claimed that “cruelister consistently demonstrated that Comodo performs better than others”. </p><p>Then from the test you brought up, this doesn’t seem to be the case.</p><p></p><p>All other posts, I am trying to read now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1100357, member: 99014"] Your posts came all at once and it is a hell to even follow up, so some will probably remain unread, this is due to moderation and not my fault, I will read and reply to whatever I can. Norton is highly recommended and does a better job, on the Neil Rubenking tests, it has never missed thousands of malware samples on any test, in fact, Norton is consistently demonstrated to be top performer. The Norton technology is governed by over 2500 patents which serve as a statement of Norton (and Symantec) R&D effort. If you wanna argue, show me a test where Norton did not get excellent scores. Comodo will not reach the Norton technological excellence even if everyone from Gen Digital goes on a 5-year holiday and Comodo decides to finally invest. Comparing Norton (and others that you mentioned there) with Comodo is hilarious at most. Now your other comment, that you did not say it was “unbeatable” from one of your accounts (they are just so many), I believe it was Kaylin or something like that, you claimed that “cruelister consistently demonstrated that Comodo performs better than others”. Then from the test you brought up, this doesn’t seem to be the case. All other posts, I am trying to read now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top