As a UAC example, let me expand on the last scene in the video- as you noticed, UAC kept hammering away asking if we wanted to block the Volume Shadow Copy Service (vssadmin). So although UAC would not in any way stop the encryption process, if we did block vssadmin from acting we would have saved our System Restore Point (assuming you have System Restore enabled). I am in no way trying to minimize this! On an otherwise unprotected system we would be able to restore our files.
Now, what about UAC and Comodo (which I didn't touch on for the Tesla)? If we had Containment at Restricted no UAC popups would have occurred, mainly because this malware actually spawns a daughter that does the damage. Restricted mode will prevent this spawning.
For the Partially Limited setting the malware would be allowed to spawn, but the daughter would also be contained. Now this daughter would also try to access vssadmin (but this also would be contained). If you had UAC on also, it would react with a popup, but the reaction would be to stuff happening in the virtual environment, thus clicking either Yes or No would not matter to your actual system [fun fact: consent.exe (aka UAC) is in this case also running in the sandbox. When the popup occurs flushing the sandbox at that point would also get rid of that popup].
I realize I might be going a bit into the weeds with the above, but in short Comodo meets and exceeds protection provided by UAC. If it did not then this would constitute a simplistic breach of Comodo and I would never use it (never ever).