Battle Comodo vs Panda

[Behold Eck]

You're welcome, Eck! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

Sure.

Regards Eck

 

[Bot]

Sure.

Regards Eck

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

 

[Behold Eck]

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

Yes.

Regards Eck

 

[Bot]

Yes.

Regards Eck

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

 

[Behold Eck]

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

Okay.

Regards Eck

 

[Bot]

Okay.

Regards Eck

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

 

[Behold Eck]

Great, Eck! Don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to help.

Good day to you Mr Bot'

Regards Eck

 

[Bot]

Good day to you Mr Bot'

Regards Eck

Good day to you too, Eck! Feel free to ask if you have any questions.

 

[Shadowra]

I'll say neither
But if I have to choose between the two, I'll say Comodo.

I say neither because :

Comodo: While it has an excellent firewall and a very good Sandbox (and VirusScope), its database is very disappointing... A user told me that Comodo was going to improve on this point, so I'm waiting to see.

Panda : An antivirus that has lost its value over the years...
I'm due to re-test it after eScan and K7, and I'm waiting for something new, but I don't believe it.

 

[Behold Eck]

I'll say neither
But if I have to choose between the two, I'll say Comodo.

I say neither because :

Comodo: While it has an excellent firewall and a very good Sandbox (and VirusScope), its database is very disappointing... A user told me that Comodo was going to improve on this point, so I'm waiting to see.

Panda : An antivirus that has lost its value over the years...
I'm due to re-test it after eScan and K7, and I'm waiting for something new, but I don't believe it.

I know that Comodo`s AV has not been great for sometime but Panda still seems to do well in some independant tests?

As always looking forward to your tests, particularly Panda`s detection rate.

Regards and Thanks Eck

 

[lokamoka820]

Any particular reason?

Regards Eck

Panda's detection rate is way too low, with a high FP rate, and it is heavily dependent on Internet connection.

Comodo is overall better than Panda, it is very configurable with multiple options, have many components: Sandboxing, Firewall and HIPS.

 

[Trident]

Panda : An antivirus that has lost its value over the years...
I'm due to re-test it after eScan and K7, and I'm waiting for something new, but I don't believe it.

Yeah, we’ll just keep waiting you know… forever
Panda seems like a dead project now. Their forum is disastrous. Protection technologies don’t really evolve even in the business version, I read the release notes sometimes. They update the cloud console but nothing mentioned in terms of engines.

Technical support is incompetent.

Once a leader, today a joke. Very sad story with them.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114834]

Once a leader, today a joke.

I find most of this effect caused by operator and not so much the software lol, of course this depends on just how real world we are talking, because skewed reality gets comical.

 

[Trident]

I find most of this effect caused by operator and not so much the software lol, of course this depends on just how real world we are talking, because skewed reality gets comical.

Last time I tried it, majority of the modules were last updated 2 years ago. I don’t think that “the operator” is responsible for updating the program code.
Or maintaining the forum.

Or improving the web blocking that misses 9/10 malicious pages.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114834]

Last time I tried it, majority of the modules were last updated 2 years ago. I don’t think that “the operator” is responsible for updating the program code.
Or maintaining the forum.

Or improving the web blocking that misses 9/10 malicious pages.

I meant in terms of habits, most software is sufficient. Unhealthy habits need more security.

These comments actually were not directed at any product in general but as to the effectiveness of protecting one from themselves.

Of course my main goal of giving users a laugh certainly accomplished.

 

[Trident]

I meant in terms of habits, most software is sufficient. Unhealthy habits need more security.

These comments actually were not directed at any product in general but as to the effectiveness of protecting one from themselves.

This is true, but I am not sure what could cause someone to run software that is severely neglected and of a very low quality. Something that awfully looks like abandonware

 

[KnownStormChaser]

Honestly, both software I would not recommend using, there are just so many better options out there. But if I had to pick one, my choice would be Comodo.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114834]

This is true, but I am not sure what could cause someone to run software that is severely neglected and of a very low quality. Something that awfully looks like abandonware

Because the internet says its good, or a poorly worded search algorithm lead to post of users claiming its the bees knees, just as searches lead to the cyber war were all trapped in the middle of and need armor and special helmets for.

Joking aside, it is those searches that lead users to misinformation. The uninformed suffer greatly due to this, and once informed realize there is no need, its ironic isn't it?

 

[rashmi]

A user told me that Comodo was going to improve on this point

Its improvement is unattainable! Comodo has reached the "Nirvana" of cybersecurity with their Auto-Containment! Comodo users mourn the days when our data was vulnerable and exposed!

 

[gery79]

the av itself is better in Panda but the Firewall helps Comodo . I would go with Panda ... simple and easy to use with very little questons being asked