Crypto Prevent Review - UPDATED

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted Member 333v73x
  • Start date Start date

What do you think of Crypto Prevent?

  • 5 - Outstanding

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • 4 - Very Good

    Votes: 12 48.0%

  • 3 - Good

    Votes: 4 16.0%

  • 2 - Average

    Votes: 2 8.0%

  • 1- Bad

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .
Product name
Crypto Prevent
Pros
  • - Uses Immunization features, no resource usage
    - Many settings and options
    - Default settings good enough
    - Compatible with all security programs
    - Free
CONS
- Certain modes can prevent installs and un-installs (you have to disable it)
- SOME users experience slight issues
BOTTOM LINE
The good outlays the bad by far here, very good program and I reccomend it!
Would love to see a comparison to HMP.A :)
@Tornado: Regarding the protection level + success :) HMP.A has an Anti-Crypto feature too, AFAIK, but never tried this one out (had a TeslaCrypt infection on my SD protected system, where the files could be encrypted regardless of HMP.A - note that QTS360 real-time protection was turned off by me during this time).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: safe1st, LabZero, Viking and 4 others
Cryptoprevent disable the ransomware's permissions.
This tool modifies the security policies of Windows to prevent a program can be run from the %AppData% and other folders.
It adds an additional security level to the programmed backups, encryption and obscuring of sensitive data with specific tools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Awesome, PauloXBR, Deleted Member 333v73x and 6 others
Klipsh said:
Cryptoprevent disable the ransomware's permissions.
This tool modifies the security policies of Windows to prevent a program can be run from the %AppData% and other folders.
It adds an additional security level to the programmed backups, encryption and obscuring of sensitive data with specific tools.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the explanation :)
Which protection level do you guys use? Will it conflict with anything (for example QTS360 or HMP.A even more?)
I would refer to this screenshot here (German article though): CryptoPrevent
I guess the Free and the low cost premium are the same (referring to their website), minus auto-update? Definitions are for updating policies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted Member 333v73x and safe1st
Der.Reisende said:
Thanks for the explanation :)
Which protection level do you guys use? Will it conflict with anything (for example QTS360 or HMP.A even more?)
I would refer to this screenshot here (German article though): CryptoPrevent
I guess the Free and the low cost premium are the same (referring to their website), minus auto-update? Definitions are for updating policies?
Click to expand...
Personally I use default.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XhenEd, frogboy and Der.Reisende
You must log in or register to reply here.

You may also like...