This poll will close on Mar 10, 2016 at 3:41 PM.
Would love to see a comparison to HMP.A 
@Tornado: Regarding the protection level + success HMP.A has an Anti-Crypto feature too, AFAIK, but never tried this one out (had a TeslaCrypt infection on my SD protected system, where the files could be encrypted regardless of HMP.A - note that QTS360 real-time protection was turned off by me during this time).
@Tornado: Regarding the protection level + success
HMP.A has an Anti-Crypto feature too, AFAIK, but never tried this one out (had a TeslaCrypt infection on my SD protected system, where the files could be encrypted regardless of HMP.A - note that QTS360 real-time protection was turned off by me during this time).
Last edited:
HitmanPro. Alert is an Anti-Exploit and has other features, Crypto Prevent uses immunization to block execution of files in recycle bin, startup and lots more.Would love to see a comparison to HMP.A
- Mar 1, 2014
- 1,708
CryptoPrevent's main feature is like that of Bitdefender's immunization.
Although, I think CryptoPrevent has other worthy features.
Although, I think CryptoPrevent has other worthy features.
- Jun 9, 2013
- 6,720
Thanks for the reminder i forgot all about CryptoPrevent since i moved to Windows 10.
Cryptoprevent disable the ransomware's permissions.
This tool modifies the security policies of Windows to prevent a program can be run from the %AppData% and other folders.
It adds an additional security level to the programmed backups, encryption and obscuring of sensitive data with specific tools.
This tool modifies the security policies of Windows to prevent a program can be run from the %AppData% and other folders.
It adds an additional security level to the programmed backups, encryption and obscuring of sensitive data with specific tools.
Thanks for the explanation
Which protection level do you guys use? Will it conflict with anything (for example QTS360 or HMP.A even more?)
I would refer to this screenshot here (German article though): CryptoPrevent
I guess the Free and the low cost premium are the same (referring to their website), minus auto-update? Definitions are for updating policies?
Personally I use default.Thanks for the explanation
Which protection level do you guys use? Will it conflict with anything (for example QTS360 or HMP.A even more?)
I would refer to this screenshot here (German article though): CryptoPrevent
I guess the Free and the low cost premium are the same (referring to their website), minus auto-update? Definitions are for updating policies?
