D
Deleted member 178
Drive-by Download is the general term used, like virus.My mistake. I always thought they seperated the two as drive-by-download/drive-by-install.
Drive-by Download is the general term used, like virus.My mistake. I always thought they seperated the two as drive-by-download/drive-by-install.
Are you saying a program like Appguard would be bypassed?
I meant that sandbox and SRP programs are safe. This ransomware (provided that the video is true) is not able to bypass these protections.
Speaking of Cylance A.I.. I noticed the author of this video is the developer of XyWall AntiMalware which claims to have A.I heuristics and uses VirusTotal. Anyone ever use this program before? I tried it out in a VM for only a couple minutes, it has a high detection (and false positive rate). WD detected it as a trojan right away so I ditched it shortly after.
Back to the topic, it seems only CIS was able to prevent this ransomware in the author's test series. The title of the video says bypass but the file was run outside containment on the second try. The takeaway from this video is that some malware won't reveal their true intentions in a sandbox and can surprise the user if they run the file with unlimited access.
Speaking of Cylance A.I.. I noticed the author of this video is the developer of XyWall AntiMalware which claims to have A.I heuristics and uses VirusTotal. Anyone ever use this program before? I tried it out in a VM for only a couple minutes, it has a high detection (and false positive rate). WD detected it as a trojan right away so I ditched it shortly after.
Back to the topic, it seems only CIS was able to prevent this ransomware in the author's test series. The title of the video says bypass but the file was run outside containment on the second try. The takeaway from this video is that some malware won't reveal their true intentions in a sandbox and can surprise the user if they run the file with unlimited access.
That or he could be clickbaiting for views.Or he fakes results if he is calling pressing run unlimited as bypass. lol
Still unethical enough that I personally wouldn't believe anything he posts. Not saying that the products he tested can't be bypassed, i am just saying i wouldn't trust a video he makes showing a bypass.That or he could be clickbaiting for views.
It probably won't be safe once that system clock disappears and the tester disables key protection fetures.