App Review Shadowra's Big Comparative - Episode 3 Entreprise Antivirus

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
Shadowra

Shadowra

Level 38
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
Sep 2, 2021
2,744
In this video, we compare 7 entreprise antivirus programs.
The aim is to see how effective they are, and rank them from worst to best.

Please note:

- the antiviruses are already ranked in the video, I've taken into account Web blocking, the reaction to an attack, my malware pack and how the antivirus will defend itself.
- Please be courteous and respect my ranking. Filming took over 9 hours and 2 hours of preparation.
- The final episode will pit 2 antiviruses against each other.
- personal information was hidden on the panel of these antivirus programs. some of them didn't belong to me. Many thanks to @kamiloxf , who supplied me with most of the antivirus software I tested!
- all antivirus are default, I've only activated IF NECESSARY some options that the editor hasn't activated (heuristics, PUP detection etc.)
- the protocol is the same.



WithSecure is the Enterprise version of F-Secure.
The product is presented as an agent to be installed, and features a fairly simple panel.
It clearly follows the F-Secure nomenclature: it can be configured both online and locally!

URL: 10/10 - WithSecure blocks all links
Fake crack: 1/1 - Blocked directly by APC (Avira Protection Cloud)
Malware Pack: 45 out of 168.

Execution: Some good, some not so good. On attacks, WithSecure defends itself well with DeepGuard.
Things get more complicated later on, when AlertaAgent is allowed to pass through and install itself quite deeply on the machine.
Then the malware with the Tank icon destroys parts of the system, and a RAT (MSBuilder.exe) passes through without blocking (but disappears on reboot).

SOS: F-Secure failed to scan the machine, malware killed the scan...
NPE: 4
KVRT: 2

It ranks 7th because, although DeepGuard is excellent, it clearly lacks a few rules to protect effectively against large malware, especially signed malware.
It's a shame.

DeepInstinct is a well-known and popular enterprise antivirus.
Its agent has no settings: everything is managed online!
I leave my settings.

Web: 8/10 - 2 infections passed
Fake crack: 0/1 - No files blocked!!!
Malware pack: Remains 42 out of 168.

Execution: DeepInstinct shines with its behavioral defenses and manages to avoid several attacks.
But this didn't last, as 2 malwares were installed, 1 of which clearly destroyed the system.
The system is dead...

It's in 6th place, a slackening at DeepInstinct? I'm disappointed!

SentinelOne is DeepInstinct's direct competitor - same operation, same country of origin!
however, its Web interface is much more complete and rather complicated...

Web: 9/9 - a URL is dead
Fake crack: 1/1 - installation is blocked
Malware pack: Remains 45 out of 168

Execution: S1 does not show any analysis, I wait until there is no activity.
I start executing, S1 is reactive and protects me. But it's pretty weak on scripts. Although it blocks some, it lets a few through, which it will mitigate later.
But it will encounter the same malware as DeepInstinct, which will destroy the system.

It ranks 5th.

CylancePROTECT is BlackBerry's antivirus software, completely designed for the enterprise.
In this test, I install CylanceOptics, its EDR.
The settings are already predefined, on level 2.

Web: 8/9 - one malware missed.
Crack: 1/1 - Blocked
Malware Pack : Cylance doesn't scan, I'm forced to run.
During execution, Cylance scores very well, which I appreciate (even though it let Alerta through).
Unfortunately, a FileCoder ransomware will get through without any reaction from Cylance and encrypt the data.
If it had been blocked, I think Cylance would have won points.

It's ranked 4th, a fine improvement on my last test, but it still has some way to go!

CrowndStrike Falcon is an enterprise-class antivirus program with an excellent reputation, but also a reputation for producing major bugs (BSODs in the enterprise).
No agent interface here! Everything is controlled online!
Default setting.

Web: 9/9 - a URL was dead
Crack: 1/1 - directly forbidden
Malware Pack: 39 out of 168

Execution: Falcon does very well and is very sharp on blocking!
It blocks the installation of Alerta, but will only be tricked by the malware into killing DeepInstinct and SentinelOne.
CrowndStrike attempts to repair the system, but is unable to restore it.
Pity.

He's 3rd

Harmony is the enterprise antivirus from CheckPoint, publisher of ZoneAlarm.
It's also the antivirus I've had the most trouble with: it took me 3 attempts to get it to work, as well as a lengthy installation despite the fiber...

The settings have been customized, but are fairly close to the manufacturer's settings.

Web: 10/10 - everything was blocked
Crack: 1/1 - Dropped files were blocked.
Malware Pack: 19 out of 168

Execution: Harmony comes close to excellence in malware blocking!
2 files passed, including the malware that had made WithSecure suffer, although the attack was partially mitigated by the antivirus.

SOS :

Harmony: Unable to scan
NPE: 3

Although it did block, it will be 2nd. The malware prevents antivirus functions from working properly (scanning) and a script is passed through, although it is blocked by the Harmony firewall.

Microsoft Defender does have a version for business! It already uses the architecture already present but offers a script so that we can benefit from it. He added several rules but also an EDR, which I will test.

Web : 9/9 - a URL is dead

Crack : 1/1 - the installation is blocked

Malware Pack: Remains 17 out of 168 Execution: Microsoft Defender clearly has the best engine in this test! It avoids all the traps that I set for it, the PUBLISHER and the Cloud also block me from malware during execution! Only Alerta passes.

SOS: Microsoft Defender does not detect anything.
NPE detects 4 files that are not active, easily deletable.

He more than deserves his 1st place!

All the tests are over.
The final will oppose Microsoft Defender against ESET Smart Security :)

See you on January 31st for the final! :D
 

Harputlu

Level 5
Verified
Well-known
Dec 26, 2016
244
In this video, we compare 7 entreprise antivirus programs.
The aim is to see how effective they are, and rank them from worst to best.

Please note:

- the antiviruses are already ranked in the video, I've taken into account Web blocking, the reaction to an attack, my malware pack and how the antivirus will defend itself.
- Please be courteous and respect my ranking. Filming took over 9 hours and 2 hours of preparation.
- The final episode will pit 2 antiviruses against each other.
- personal information was hidden on the panel of these antivirus programs. some of them didn't belong to me. Many thanks to @kamiloxf , who supplied me with most of the antivirus software I tested!
- all antivirus are default, I've only activated IF NECESSARY some options that the editor hasn't activated (heuristics, PUP detection etc.)
- the protocol is the same.



WithSecure is the Enterprise version of F-Secure.
The product is presented as an agent to be installed, and features a fairly simple panel.
It clearly follows the F-Secure nomenclature: it can be configured both online and locally!

URL: 10/10 - WithSecure blocks all links
Fake crack: 1/1 - Blocked directly by APC (Avira Protection Cloud)
Malware Pack: 45 out of 168.

Execution: Some good, some not so good. On attacks, WithSecure defends itself well with DeepGuard.
Things get more complicated later on, when AlertaAgent is allowed to pass through and install itself quite deeply on the machine.
Then the malware with the Tank icon destroys parts of the system, and a RAT (MSBuilder.exe) passes through without blocking (but disappears on reboot).

SOS: F-Secure failed to scan the machine, malware killed the scan...
NPE: 4
KVRT: 2

It ranks 7th because, although DeepGuard is excellent, it clearly lacks a few rules to protect effectively against large malware, especially signed malware.
It's a shame.

DeepInstinct is a well-known and popular enterprise antivirus.
Its agent has no settings: everything is managed online!
I leave my settings.

Web: 8/10 - 2 infections passed
Fake crack: 0/1 - No files blocked!!!
Malware pack: Remains 42 out of 168.

Execution: DeepInstinct shines with its behavioral defenses and manages to avoid several attacks.
But this didn't last, as 2 malwares were installed, 1 of which clearly destroyed the system.
The system is dead...

It's in 6th place, a slackening at DeepInstinct? I'm disappointed!

SentinelOne is DeepInstinct's direct competitor - same operation, same country of origin!
however, its Web interface is much more complete and rather complicated...

Web: 9/9 - a URL is dead
Fake crack: 1/1 - installation is blocked
Malware pack: Remains 45 out of 168

Execution: S1 does not show any analysis, I wait until there is no activity.
I start executing, S1 is reactive and protects me. But it's pretty weak on scripts. Although it blocks some, it lets a few through, which it will mitigate later.
But it will encounter the same malware as DeepInstinct, which will destroy the system.

It ranks 5th.

CylancePROTECT is BlackBerry's antivirus software, completely designed for the enterprise.
In this test, I install CylanceOptics, its EDR.
The settings are already predefined, on level 2.

Web: 8/9 - one malware missed.
Crack: 1/1 - Blocked
Malware Pack : Cylance doesn't scan, I'm forced to run.
During execution, Cylance scores very well, which I appreciate (even though it let Alerta through).
Unfortunately, a FileCoder ransomware will get through without any reaction from Cylance and encrypt the data.
If it had been blocked, I think Cylance would have won points.

It's ranked 4th, a fine improvement on my last test, but it still has some way to go!

CrowndStrike Falcon is an enterprise-class antivirus program with an excellent reputation, but also a reputation for producing major bugs (BSODs in the enterprise).
No agent interface here! Everything is controlled online!
Default setting.

Web: 9/9 - a URL was dead
Crack: 1/1 - directly forbidden
Malware Pack: 39 out of 168

Execution: Falcon does very well and is very sharp on blocking!
It blocks the installation of Alerta, but will only be tricked by the malware into killing DeepInstinct and SentinelOne.
CrowndStrike attempts to repair the system, but is unable to restore it.
Pity.

He's 3rd

Harmony is the enterprise antivirus from CheckPoint, publisher of ZoneAlarm.
It's also the antivirus I've had the most trouble with: it took me 3 attempts to get it to work, as well as a lengthy installation despite the fiber...

The settings have been customized, but are fairly close to the manufacturer's settings.

Web: 10/10 - everything was blocked
Crack: 1/1 - Dropped files were blocked.
Malware Pack: 19 out of 168

Execution: Harmony comes close to excellence in malware blocking!
2 files passed, including the malware that had made WithSecure suffer, although the attack was partially mitigated by the antivirus.

SOS :

Harmony: Unable to scan
NPE: 3

Although it did block, it will be 2nd. The malware prevents antivirus functions from working properly (scanning) and a script is passed through, although it is blocked by the Harmony firewall.

Microsoft Defender does have a version for business! It already uses the architecture already present but offers a script so that we can benefit from it. He added several rules but also an EDR, which I will test.

Web : 9/9 - a URL is dead

Crack : 1/1 - the installation is blocked

Malware Pack: Remains 17 out of 168 Execution: Microsoft Defender clearly has the best engine in this test! It avoids all the traps that I set for it, the PUBLISHER and the Cloud also block me from malware during execution! Only Alerta passes.

SOS: Microsoft Defender does not detect anything.
NPE detects 4 files that are not active, easily deletable.

He more than deserves his 1st place!

All the tests are over.
The final will oppose Microsoft Defender against ESET Smart Security :)

See you on January 31st for the final! :D

Actually, not including sophos in this test was a big omission. It is one of the first antiviruses that comes to mind when it comes to corporate antivirus. Thanks for the test. You put a lot of time and effort.
 

Jonny Quest

Level 23
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 2, 2023
1,278
The results for WithSecure didn't really surprise me. It's kind of going hand in hand with the Personal app, and some of the changes their making with it, not for the better.
Thank you, Shadowra, excellent work :)
 
Last edited:

Shadowra

Level 38
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
Sep 2, 2021
2,744
Actually, not including sophos in this test was a big omission. It is one of the first antiviruses that comes to mind when it comes to corporate antivirus. Thanks for the test. You put a lot of time and effort.

I didn't have access to Intercept X during the test and Harmony uses it :)
Maybe one day I'll make a video dedicated to it ;)
 

oldschool

Level 85
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 29, 2018
7,934
Great video review! It's insightful to see how these enterprise antivirus programs stack up against each other. Looking forward to the final showdown between Microsoft Defender and ESET Smart Security.
Kill the @Bot ! :LOL::LOL::LOL:

So much buzz about enterprise solutions, and yet ... :rolleyes:🥱 Can't see why ordinary users would bother.

Excellent work @Shadowra!!! 👍👍
 

simmerskool

Level 40
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 16, 2017
2,939
So much buzz about enterprise solutions, and yet ... :rolleyes:🥱 Can't see why ordinary users would bother.

Excellent work @Shadowra!!! 👍👍
Have to agree with you re the enterprise buzz (I'm "guilty") but wondering if or how much better MS Defender for Business is than standard Defender with windows? @Shadowra, any idea or comment? I have a license for MS Defender for Business but don't have it "deployed," but now wondering maybe not worth the effort or continued expense. :unsure:
 

Shadowra

Level 38
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
Sep 2, 2021
2,744
Have to agree with you re the enterprise buzz (I'm "guilty") but wondering if or how much better MS Defender for Business is than standard Defender with windows? @Shadowra, any idea or comment? I have a license for MS Defender for Business but don't have it "deployed," but now wondering maybe not worth the effort or continued expense. :unsure:

For us, as private individuals, it's completely useless.
 

Miravi

Level 1
Aug 31, 2024
22
Microsoft Defender towering above in two different sets of tests is mightily impressive, but certainly in line with the kinds of improvements we've been seeing. It goes to show that you could easily overestimate the advantages of rarified enterprise products.

Thank you as always, Shadowra!
 
Last edited:

VAR_123

Level 2
Verified
Dec 4, 2021
50
Appreciated my friend @Shadowra 👍

ESET:cool:, I think ESET will win the final. The only issue is that ESET home product detections are not as great as their business enterprise, like ESET Protect Advanced. Recently, AV-TEST conducted ransomware tests, and ESET Security Ultimate was unable to detect it, but ESET Protect Advanced detected it. Can anyone explain how it is possible that ESET signatures are the same or different for home and business/enterprise users?
 

Vitali Ortzi

Level 30
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Dec 12, 2016
1,921
Appreciated my friend @Shadowra 👍

ESET:cool:, I think ESET will win the final. The only issue is that ESET home product detections are not as great as their business enterprise, like ESET Protect Advanced. Recently, AV-TEST conducted ransomware tests, and ESET Security Ultimate was unable to detect it, but ESET Protect Advanced detected it. Can anyone explain how it is possible that ESET signatures are the same or different for home and business/enterprise users?
It's the same signatures but advanced has certain technologies that aren't yet launched in the consumer products like ransomware remediation (rollback )

I'm using the eset protect advanced and it has ransomware remediation enabled by default but except ransomware protection there shouldn't be a difference in the default config of the endpoint product over consumer products and that feature should be available to consumers at some point as well



To improve protection against ransomware, we're introducing Ransomware Remediation, a new feature that complements the existing Ransomware Shield. This proprietary technology helps automatically restore encrypted files when ransomware is detected later in the attack after the encryption process has already started.

This feature will be included in our endpoint products for Windows 12.0 from December 2024 and enabled for ESET PROTECT Advanced subscribers and higher

Btw about ransomware protection on eset , av software that use hardware features would unfortunately have worse results under a VM where it can't access the hardware features
 
Last edited:

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top