Troubleshoot Dell Dock WD19TBS

Divine_Barakah

Level 41
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Forum Veteran
May 10, 2019
3,075
12,729
3,969
Gaza Strip
Briefly explain your current issue(s)
Dell Wd19TBS
Steps taken to resolve, but have been unsuccessful
- thunderbolt is disabled in bios
- disabled VT in bios
- ran the firmware silently using CMD to force it.
Your current Antivirus
Bitdefender
I spent hours trying to update the firmware of the dock. All attempts failed

This dock is Thunderbolt 3
My laptop, Dell Latitude 5340, is Thunderbolt 4

Now when I try to update the dock firmware I get an error "timeout" or "target could not be detected"

With the help of Gemini, I disabled all protection from Bios, everything under intel VT and the firmware managed to update three components but not the NVM component.

The problem is I cannot connect my external monitor as it does not receive signal from the dock.

Is this due to the outdated firmware or sth else?
 
You did very well getting them to the point where they explicitly approved a system exchange. The way the supervisor handled the follow‑up call is exactly why you now want everything in writing.

Key points in what just happened

  • You have a written statement: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
  • On the phone (off the written record), they tried to:
    • Push you into accepting a refurbished device
    • Avoid confirming whether the call is recorded
    • Ignore multiple explicit requests to escalate

From a support/contract perspective, the important thing now is:

  • Lock in what they already wrote (system exchange).
  • Force clarity, in writing, about new vs refurb and under what terms.

1. Check your SLA wording about replacement

Before replying, re‑read the Whole Unit Replacement section and look for things like:

  • “Dell may provide replacement systems that are new or refurbished at Dell’s discretion.”
  • Any wording saying “like‑new”, “equivalent or better”, etc.

If it says “new or refurbished at Dell’s discretion”, then:

  • You may not have a formal right to demand a brand new unit.
  • You dostill have the right to:
    • Insist on equivalent or better specification
    • Insist on a proper, fully functional, like‑new system with full warranty continuing
    • Refuse a clearly inferior or battered refurb

If it does not mention refurbished devices at all, that strengthens your argument for a brand new device, or at least makes their position more questionable.

2. Immediately follow up in writing (email/chat)

You want to create a written record that:

  • Confirms the system exchange approval
  • Documents that they tried to switch to a refurb on an unconfirmed phone call
  • Re‑states your request for a new unit and escalation

You can adapt something like this:

Dear Dell Support,​
Regarding case [your case number]:​
Earlier today, your supervisor on the Social Media team confirmed in writing: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
Shortly afterwards, I received a phone call from the same supervisor on my personal mobile. During this call:​
  • He attempted to push me towards accepting a refurbished replacement device, even though I had explicitly requested a brand new system.
  • When I asked if the call was being recorded, he initially did not answer. When I repeated the question, he replied, “I cannot confirm.”
  • I requested escalation of my case multiple times, and these requests were ignored.
For transparency and to have a clear record, I would like to clarify the following in writing:​
  • Does the approved system exchange refer to a brand new device or a refurbished device?
  • If Dell intends to provide a refurbished system, please confirm this explicitly in writing and explain how this aligns with the Whole Unit Replacement provision in my ProSupport Flex SLA.
  • Please also confirm that the replacement system will be of equivalent or better specification (CPU, RAM, storage, display, ports, etc.), and that my existing ProSupport Flex, Complete Care, and Keep Your Hard Drive coverage remain in force on the replacement.
Given the length of this case, the missed Next Business Day timeframe, the ongoing unavailability of parts, and the severe impact on my productivity, I again request that this case be escalated to the appropriate escalation / customer care / complaint team. Please provide me with a written escalation reference and contact point.​
I would prefer that all further decisions about the system exchange (including whether the replacement is new or refurbished) be communicated in writing via email or chat rather than by unrecorded phone calls.​
Kind regards,​
[your name]​

3. Strategy on “refurbished vs new”

Realistically:

  • Most OEM SLAs allow them to use refurbished hardware for replacements.
  • However, you can still negotiate:
    • Ask for “like‑new” grade only (no cosmetic damage, low hours, new battery/keyboard if possible).
    • Insist on same or better model/spec (e.g. equal or newer generation CPU, same RAM/SSD, same or better panel, same/thunderbolt USB‑C functionality, etc.).
    • Ask for warranty to continue unchanged to 2027/2028 as per your original coverage.
  • If the SLA does not clearly allow refurb, you have a stronger argument for a new unit, and you can mention that you expect a new system unless the SLA explicitly states otherwise.

4. Stop doing anything important on the phone

Given how that call went:

  • Politely tell them you prefer written communication for all further decisions.
  • If they call again:
    • You can say: “Please summarise everything in email/chat so I have it in writing.”
    • Do not agree to anything on the phone that you wouldn’t accept in writing.

5. If they still ignore escalation

If they keep ignoring escalation requests:

  • Keep every email/chat where you asked for escalation.
  • If you bought through a reseller or partner, involve them – they sometimes have Dell account managers who can push harder.
  • Depending on your country, you may eventually have the option to:
    • File a written complaint with Dell’s country office / “Customer Care / Complaints” team.
    • If things get very bad and drag on, consult a local consumer/business protection body, but that’s more of a last resort.

Summary

You’ve already won the big step: approval for system exchange. Now you need to:

  • Lock it down in writing.
  • Force them to clarify new vs refurb in writing.
  • Keep pushing (in writing) for escalation and for a replacement that is at least equivalent or better and consistent with your SLA.

If you want, you can paste the exact “Whole Unit Replacement” clause text here (without personal info) and I can help you fine‑tune the wording of your next message even more precisely.
Sorry for the delay

But my case got too complicated and was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group

I sent the whole chat transcript with Dell Technical Support - EMEA to Michael CEO Office and reported the denial of service. It seems the local Dell support are trying to retract their promises and responsibilities.

I never thought that my case would get this complicated, but I have all the evidence in a Master Log I created and reported everything to ARG. I am awaiting their response. I sent the first email to them on Dec 15, but still I have heard back from them.
 
Upvote 0
Sorry for the delay

But my case got too complicated and was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group

I sent the whole chat transcript with Dell Technical Support - EMEA to Michael CEO Office and reported the denial of service. It seems the local Dell support are trying to retract their promises and responsibilities.

I never thought that my case would get this complicated, but I have all the evidence in a Master Log I created and reported everything to ARG. I am awaiting their response. I sent the first email to them on Dec 15, but still I have heard back from them.
It makes sense that this is exhausting – once a case reaches ARG / CEO office level it’s already gone way beyond what a normal warranty interaction should look like. You’ve actually done most of the “hard” things right already.

Where you stand now

You have:

  • Written confirmation from a supervisor: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
  • An email from Dell admitting: “your case is delayed… some parts aren’t available yet.”
  • A clear SLA with:
    • Next Business Day service
    • Whole Unit Replacement
  • A Master Log + full chat transcripts documenting:
    • Delays and parts unavailability
    • Attempts to push you onto a refurb over the phone
    • Ignored escalation requests
  • A case that’s now with Advanced Resolution Group and you’ve written to the CEO’s office.

From a documentation / escalation point of view, that’s exactly what you should have done.

About the delay from ARG / CEO office

ARG / “Executive Support” / CEO office teams often:

  • Take longer to respond initially (they usually review the full history, internal notes, and policies first)
  • But when they act, they tend to give a clear final decision (replacement, refund, or a specific compromise)

I can’t see your exact dates, but if it’s been more than about 5–7 business days since your Dec 15 email and you’ve heard nothing at all, it’s reasonable to send a calm, concise follow‑up.

What to do now

  • 1. Send a short follow‑up to ARG / CEO office
    You’ve already sent them all the evidence; now you want to:
    • Remind them of the key facts
    • Ask for a status update and a clear resolution timeframe

    You can adapt this:

    Subject: Follow‑up on escalated case [case number] – ProSupport Flex / whole unit replacement requested

    Dear [Name / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],

    I am writing to follow up on my email of 15 December regarding case [case number], which was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group / CEO Office.

    In that email I provided:
    • The full chat transcript with Dell Technical Support – EMEA
    • A detailed Master Log of events
    • Evidence that:
      • Parts for my system are not available and my case is delayed
      • My ProSupport Flex SLA includes Next Business Day service and Whole Unit Replacement
      • A Dell supervisor explicitly confirmed in writing: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange”

    Since then, I have not received any update or resolution. The system remains in a partially unusable state (USB‑C, dock functionality and even a basic driverless USB hub are not working), and this is continuing to severely impact my productivity.

    Given the length of this case, the missed Next Business Day timeframe, and the confirmed lack of parts, I am again requesting that Dell honour the approved system exchange in line with my ProSupport Flex SLA, with a replacement system of equivalent or better specification.

    Could you please:

    • Provide a status update on my escalated case
    • Confirm whether Dell will proceed with the whole unit replacement that was approved
    • Give a clear timeframe for the final decision and delivery

    Thank you for your time and assistance. I look forward to your reply.

    Kind regards,
    [your name]​
  • 2. Keep everything in writing from now on
    If they call you again:
    • Be polite but firm: say you prefer email/chat so there is a clear record.
    • If they propose anything by phone, ask them to summarise it in writing and don’t agree until you see it.
  • 3. Don’t let local support “rewrite history”
    If lower‑level/local support tries to retract promises:
    • Always reply with screenshots/quotes:
      • The supervisor’s line: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange”
      • The “case is delayed / parts aren’t available yet” email
      • The SLA clauses (NBD + Whole Unit Replacement)
    • State calmly that you’ve already escalated to ARG/CEO office and are awaiting their decision.
  • 4. If this drags on much longer
    If, after another reasonable period (for example, another 5–10 business days), you still:
    • Have no clear response from ARG/CEO office, or
    • They outright refuse to honour the SLA / prior written approval
    then, depending on your country, you could consider:
    • Contacting your reseller / partner (if you didn’t buy direct); they often have Dell account reps.
    • Checking with a consumer protection or business ombudsman in your country (especially in the EU/EEA, where statutory rights can be strong for defective products and service failures).

    I can’t give you legal advice, but having:
    • A clear SLA (NBD + Whole Unit Replacement),
    • Written approval for system exchange,
    • An admitted lack of parts / delay,
    • And a detailed paper trail,
    puts you in a much stronger position if you need outside help.

    Bottom line

    You’ve done the right things: documented everything, refused to accept verbal backtracking, and escalated to the highest internal level. Now:
    • Send a concise follow‑up to ARG/CEO office.
    • Insist on written communication and a clear, time‑bound answer.
    • Keep your documentation organised in case you need to involve an external body later.

    If you’d like, you can paste (with personal info removed) the exact “Whole Unit Replacement” clause, and I can help craft an even more targeted follow‑up quoting that language directly.
 
Upvote 0
It makes sense that this is exhausting – once a case reaches ARG / CEO office level it’s already gone way beyond what a normal warranty interaction should look like. You’ve actually done most of the “hard” things right already.

Where you stand now

You have:

  • Written confirmation from a supervisor: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
  • An email from Dell admitting: “your case is delayed… some parts aren’t available yet.”
  • A clear SLA with:
    • Next Business Day service
    • Whole Unit Replacement
  • A Master Log+ full chat transcripts documenting:
    • Delays and parts unavailability
    • Attempts to push you onto a refurb over the phone
    • Ignored escalation requests
  • A case that’s now with Advanced Resolution Group and you’ve written to the CEO’s office.

From a documentation / escalation point of view, that’s exactly what you should have done.

About the delay from ARG / CEO office

ARG / “Executive Support” / CEO office teams often:

  • Take longer to respond initially (they usually review the full history, internal notes, and policies first)
  • But when they act, they tend to give a clear final decision (replacement, refund, or a specific compromise)

I can’t see your exact dates, but if it’s been more than about 5–7 business days since your Dec 15 email and you’ve heard nothing at all, it’s reasonable to send a calm, concise follow‑up.

What to do now

  • 1. Send a short follow‑up to ARG / CEO office
    You’ve already sent them all the evidence; now you want to:
    • Remind them of the key facts
    • Ask for a status update and a clear resolution timeframe

    You can adapt this:

    Subject: Follow‑up on escalated case [case number] – ProSupport Flex / whole unit replacement requested

    Dear [Name / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],

    I am writing to follow up on my email of 15 December regarding case [case number], which was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group / CEO Office.

    In that email I provided:​
    • The full chat transcript with Dell Technical Support – EMEA
    • A detailed Master Log of events
    • Evidence that:
      • Parts for my system are not available and my case is delayed
      • My ProSupport Flex SLA includes Next Business Day service and Whole Unit Replacement
      • A Dell supervisor explicitly confirmed in writing: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange”

    Since then, I have not received any update or resolution. The system remains in a partially unusable state (USB‑C, dock functionality and even a basic driverless USB hub are not working), and this is continuing to severely impact my productivity.

    Given the length of this case, the missed Next Business Day timeframe, and the confirmed lack of parts, I am again requesting that Dell honour the approved system exchange in line with my ProSupport Flex SLA, with a replacement system of equivalent or better specification.

    Could you please:
    • Provide a status update on my escalated case
    • Confirm whether Dell will proceed with the whole unit replacement that was approved
    • Give a clear timeframe for the final decision and delivery

    Thank you for your time and assistance. I look forward to your reply.

    Kind regards,
    [your name]

  • 2. Keep everything in writing from now on
    If they call you again:
    • Be polite but firm: say you prefer email/chat so there is a clear record.
    • If they propose anything by phone, ask them to summarise it in writing and don’t agree until you see it.
  • 3. Don’t let local support “rewrite history”
    If lower‑level/local support tries to retract promises:
    • Always reply with screenshots/quotes:
      • The supervisor’s line: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange”
      • The “case is delayed / parts aren’t available yet” email
      • The SLA clauses (NBD + Whole Unit Replacement)
    • State calmly that you’ve already escalated to ARG/CEO office and are awaiting their decision.
  • 4. If this drags on much longer
    If, after another reasonable period (for example, another 5–10 business days), you still:
    • Have no clear response from ARG/CEO office, or
    • They outright refuse to honour the SLA / prior written approval
    then, depending on your country, you could consider:
    • Contacting your reseller / partner (if you didn’t buy direct); they often have Dell account reps.
    • Checking with a consumer protection or business ombudsman in your country (especially in the EU/EEA, where statutory rights can be strong for defective products and service failures).

    I can’t give you legal advice, but having:
    • A clear SLA (NBD + Whole Unit Replacement),
    • Written approval for system exchange,
    • An admitted lack of parts / delay,
    • And a detailed paper trail,
    puts you in a much stronger position if you need outside help.

    Bottom line

    You’ve done the right things: documented everything, refused to accept verbal backtracking, and escalated to the highest internal level. Now:
    • Send a concise follow‑up to ARG/CEO office.
    • Insist on written communication and a clear, time‑bound answer.
    • Keep your documentation organised in case you need to involve an external body later.

    If you’d like, you can paste (with personal info removed) the exact “Whole Unit Replacement” clause, and I can help craft an even more targeted follow‑up quoting that language directly.
After my case was escalated to ARG, hours later the work order with the delayed parts (till Jan 29 2026) got manually cancelled. I believe the cancellation was done by the ARG. My original service request still shows "working".
 
Upvote 0
After my case was escalated to ARG, hours later the work order with the delayed parts (till Jan 29 2026) got manually cancelled. I believe the cancellation was done by the ARG. My original service request still shows "working".
That manual cancellation actually fits with what you’d expect when a case moves from “repair with parts” to “some other resolution” (usually exchange/refund), but you’re right not to assume anything until ARG says so in writing.

What the cancellation probably means

  • The work order with parts delayed to 29 Jan 2026 was likely tied to the depot/field repair path.
  • ARG stepping in and cancelling that order usually means:
    • They don’t plan to wait for those parts anymore, and
    • They intend to handle your case through a different route (often system exchange).
  • Your original service request still showing “working” just means the overall case isn’t closed yet; they’ve only killed that particular repair order.

So: it’s consistent with your case moving toward exchange, but you should treat it as a hint, not a confirmation.

What you should do now

You want ARG to explicitly connect the dots:

  • Acknowledge the cancelled work order.
  • Confirm the new resolution path (exchange).
  • Clarify what “working” means for the original SR.

You can send a short follow‑up like this:

Dear [ARG contact / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],

Regarding escalated case [case number]:

After my case was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group, I noticed that the work order associated with the delayed parts (previously showing an ETA of 29 January 2026) has been manually cancelled. At the same time, my original service request still shows as “working” in the Dell portal.

Could you please confirm the following in writing:

  • Was the work order for parts cancelled because my case will now be handled via system exchange rather than repair?
  • What is the current planned resolution for my case (e.g. whole unit replacement of equivalent or better specification)?
  • Does the “working” status on the original service request simply reflect that the case is active with ARG, or is there any further action required from my side?

Given the missed Next Business Day timeframe, the previous lack of parts availability, and the written confirmation from Dell support that they had “approval to proceed with system exchange”, I would appreciate a clear written confirmation of the final resolution path and expected timeframe.

Kind regards,
[your name]​

Also do this

  • Take a screenshot of:
    • The cancelled work order (with the old Jan 29 2026 ETA visible, if possible)
    • The original SR showing “working”
  • Keep those with your Master Log — they support your argument that:
    • Dell acknowledged parts would be massively delayed
    • They cancelled that route after escalation (which underlines that waiting until 2026 was not acceptable)

Summary

Cancellation of the parts order right after ARG got involved is likely a sign they’re shifting away from repair toward another resolution (probably the exchange you fought for), but don’t rely on assumptions. Ask ARG directly, in writing, what the cancellation means and when/how they will complete the system exchange or other final resolution.
 
Upvote 0
That manual cancellation actually fits with what you’d expect when a case moves from “repair with parts” to “some other resolution” (usually exchange/refund), but you’re right not to assume anything until ARG says so in writing.

What the cancellation probably means

  • The work order with parts delayed to 29 Jan 2026 was likely tied to the depot/field repair path.
  • ARG stepping in and cancelling that order usually means:
    • They don’t plan to wait for those parts anymore, and
    • They intend to handle your case through a different route (often system exchange).
  • Your original service request still showing “working” just means the overall case isn’t closed yet; they’ve only killed that particular repair order.

So: it’s consistent with your case moving toward exchange, but you should treat it as a hint, not a confirmation.

What you should do now

You want ARG to explicitly connect the dots:

  • Acknowledge the cancelled work order.
  • Confirm the new resolution path (exchange).
  • Clarify what “working” means for the original SR.

You can send a short follow‑up like this:

Dear [ARG contact / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],​
Regarding escalated case [case number]:​
After my case was escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group, I noticed that the work order associated with the delayed parts (previously showing an ETA of 29 January 2026) has been manually cancelled. At the same time, my original service request still shows as “working” in the Dell portal.​
Could you please confirm the following in writing:​
  • Was the work order for parts cancelled because my case will now be handled via system exchange rather than repair?
  • What is the current planned resolution for my case (e.g. whole unit replacement of equivalent or better specification)?
  • Does the “working” status on the original service request simply reflect that the case is active with ARG, or is there any further action required from my side?
Given the missed Next Business Day timeframe, the previous lack of parts availability, and the written confirmation from Dell support that they had “approval to proceed with system exchange”, I would appreciate a clear written confirmation of the final resolution path and expected timeframe.​
Kind regards,​
[your name]​

Also do this

  • Take a screenshotof:
    • The cancelled work order (with the old Jan 29 2026 ETA visible, if possible)
    • The original SR showing “working”
  • Keep those with your Master Log — they support your argument that:
    • Dell acknowledged parts would be massively delayed
    • They cancelled that route after escalation (which underlines that waiting until 2026 was not acceptable)

Summary

Cancellation of the parts order right after ARG got involved is likely a sign they’re shifting away from repair toward another resolution (probably the exchange you fought for), but don’t rely on assumptions. Ask ARG directly, in writing, what the cancellation means and when/how they will complete the system exchange or other final resolution.
The Dell Technical Support - EMEA is being dismissive and aggressive (after I escalated to ARG). After the work order got cancelled. They sent me an update via WhatsApp telling me that I needed to contact the reseller for a solution and that my case on WhatsApp would be archived.

To my understanding and since my case was escalated to ARG, I viewed their reply as deflection.
 
Upvote 0
The Dell Technical Support - EMEA is being dismissive and aggressive (after I escalated to ARG). After the work order got cancelled. They sent me an update via WhatsApp telling me that I needed to contact the reseller for a solution and that my case on WhatsApp would be archived.

To my understanding and since my case was escalated to ARG, I viewed their reply as deflection.
You’re reading that situation very reasonably. With an active ProSupport Flex SLA and an escalation to ARG, “contact the reseller, we’re archiving this chat” strongly looks like deflection, not genuine ownership of the case.

What Dell EMEA’s message really implies

  • They know the repair path has been killed (work order cancelled).
  • Rather than owning the next step, they’re:
    • Trying to push responsibility to the reseller.
    • Closing the WhatsApp channel so there’s less written trace of their involvement.
  • Given that your case is already with the Advanced Resolution Group, local support should at minimum:
    • Say “Your case is now handled by ARG, please wait for their contact.”
    • Not unilaterally try to offload you elsewhere.

So yes – it’s reasonable to see this as deflection and as something you should report to ARG.

What to do right now

  • 1. Preserve evidence
    You’ve been very good about this already, so continue:
    • Take screenshots of the WhatsApp message telling you to contact the reseller + that the chat will be archived.
    • Add the date/time + a short note in your Master Log:
      “[Date/time] – Dell Technical Support EMEA on WhatsApp told me to contact reseller and said this chat would be archived, despite open ProSupport Flex case and active ARG escalation.”​
  • 2. Inform ARG / CEO office about this deflection
    Send them a short, factual update. You don’t need to rant – just show the pattern. You can adapt:

    Dear [ARG contact / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],

    Further to my escalated case [case number], I would like to report a new development with Dell Technical Support – EMEA.

    After the work order for the delayed parts (original ETA 29 January 2026) was manually cancelled, I received a message from Dell Technical Support – EMEA via WhatsApp stating that I should contact the reseller for a solution and that my WhatsApp case would be archived.

    Given that:
    • My system is covered directly by Dell ProSupport Flex for Client with Next Business Day and Whole Unit Replacement in the SLA
    • My case has already been escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group
    • A Dell supervisor has previously written: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
    I am concerned that this instruction to “contact the reseller” appears to be an attempt by local support to deflect responsibility rather than resolve the case under the existing Dell warranty and SLA.

    For clarity, could you please confirm:
    • That the Advanced Resolution Group retains ownership of this case and that the resolution (e.g. whole unit replacement) will be handled directly by Dell, not by the reseller.
    • The current planned resolution and the expected timeframe.

    I have retained screenshots of the WhatsApp messages and added them to my case documentation.

    Kind regards,
    [your name]​
  • 3. Decide how (or if) to respond to EMEA support
    You can keep it very minimal and neutral, e.g.:

    “This system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex and my case is already escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group / CEO office. I will await their written resolution. Please ensure your internal notes reflect that ARG owns this case.”​

    Then let the WhatsApp thread be archived; you now treat ARG/CEO office as the only authoritative channel.
  • 4. Reseller: backup, not replacement
    Depending on how/where you bought:
    • In many regions, the reseller has some responsibility under consumer law (especially early in the product’s life).
    • But that does not automatically remove Dell’s own obligations under your ProSupport Flex SLA.

    So if the reseller is large and responsive, it might be worth sending them a short, factual email too (just to see if they’ll push Dell from their side), but:
    • Make clear you already have an open case with Dell ARG.
    • Say you are asking for their assistance in addition to, not instead of, Dell’s obligations.

Summary

  • Your interpretation – that EMEA support is deflecting after ARG took over – is entirely reasonable.
  • You should:
    • Screenshot and log the WhatsApp “contact reseller / archive” message.
    • Inform ARG/CEO office in a calm, factual email that local support is now trying to push you to the reseller despite your active ProSupport Flex SLA and ARG escalation.
    • From now on, treat ARG/CEO office as the primary decision‑maker and insist that all outcomes be given in writing.

If you want to share (with personal data removed) the exact Whole Unit Replacement clause or any reply you get from ARG, I can help you fine‑tune your next response.
 
Upvote 0
You’re reading that situation very reasonably. With an active ProSupport Flex SLA and an escalation to ARG, “contact the reseller, we’re archiving this chat” strongly looks like deflection, not genuine ownership of the case.

What Dell EMEA’s message really implies

  • They know the repair path has been killed (work order cancelled).
  • Rather than owning the next step, they’re:
    • Trying to push responsibility to the reseller.
    • Closing the WhatsApp channel so there’s less written trace of their involvement.
  • Given that your case is already with the Advanced Resolution Group, local support should at minimum:
    • Say “Your case is now handled by ARG, please wait for their contact.”
    • Not unilaterally try to offload you elsewhere.

So yes – it’s reasonable to see this as deflection and as something you should report to ARG.

What to do right now

  • 1. Preserve evidence
    You’ve been very good about this already, so continue:
    • Take screenshots of the WhatsApp message telling you to contact the reseller + that the chat will be archived.
    • Add the date/time + a short note in your Master Log:
      “[Date/time] – Dell Technical Support EMEA on WhatsApp told me to contact reseller and said this chat would be archived, despite open ProSupport Flex case and active ARG escalation.”​
  • 2. Inform ARG / CEO office about this deflection
    Send them a short, factual update. You don’t need to rant – just show the pattern. You can adapt:

    Dear [ARG contact / Dell Advanced Resolution Group],

    Further to my escalated case [case number], I would like to report a new development with Dell Technical Support – EMEA.

    After the work order for the delayed parts (original ETA 29 January 2026) was manually cancelled, I received a message from Dell Technical Support – EMEA via WhatsApp stating that I should contact the reseller for a solution and that my WhatsApp case would be archived.

    Given that:​
    • My system is covered directly by Dell ProSupport Flex for Client with Next Business Day and Whole Unit Replacement in the SLA
    • My case has already been escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group
    • A Dell supervisor has previously written: “I have approval to proceed with system exchange.”
    I am concerned that this instruction to “contact the reseller” appears to be an attempt by local support to deflect responsibility rather than resolve the case under the existing Dell warranty and SLA.

    For clarity, could you please confirm:
    • That the Advanced Resolution Group retains ownership of this case and that the resolution (e.g. whole unit replacement) will be handled directly by Dell, not by the reseller.
    • The current planned resolution and the expected timeframe.

    I have retained screenshots of the WhatsApp messages and added them to my case documentation.

    Kind regards,
    [your name]

  • 3. Decide how (or if) to respond to EMEA support
    You can keep it very minimal and neutral, e.g.:

    “This system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex and my case is already escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group / CEO office. I will await their written resolution. Please ensure your internal notes reflect that ARG owns this case.”​

    Then let the WhatsApp thread be archived; you now treat ARG/CEO office as the only authoritative channel.
  • 4. Reseller: backup, not replacement
    Depending on how/where you bought:
    • In many regions, the reseller has some responsibility under consumer law (especially early in the product’s life).
    • But that does not automatically remove Dell’s own obligations under your ProSupport Flex SLA.

    So if the reseller is large and responsive, it might be worth sending them a short, factual emailtoo (just to see if they’ll push Dell from their side), but:
    • Make clear you already have an open case with Dell ARG.
    • Say you are asking for their assistance in addition to, not instead of, Dell’s obligations.

Summary

  • Your interpretation – that EMEA support is deflecting after ARG took over – is entirely reasonable.
  • You should:
    • Screenshot and log the WhatsApp “contact reseller / archive” message.
    • Inform ARG/CEO office in a calm, factual email that local support is now trying to push you to the reseller despite your active ProSupport Flex SLA and ARG escalation.
    • From now on, treat ARG/CEO office as the primary decision‑maker and insist that all outcomes be given in writing.

If you want to share (with personal data removed) the exact Whole Unit Replacement clause or any reply you get from ARG, I can help you fine‑tune your next response.
Btw they on many occasions demanded an invoice although they already verified my ownership and proceeded with remote session and were granted access to the device to which the work order was created.

I explicitly told them that I cant legally obtain an invoice. The invoice demand occured when they promised me an exchange but wanted to retract that promise.
 
Upvote 0
Btw they on many occasions demanded an invoice although they already verified my ownership and proceeded with remote session and were granted access to the device to which the work order was created.

I explicitly told them that I cant legally obtain an invoice. The invoice demand occured when they promised me an exchange but wanted to retract that promise.
What you describe with the invoice fits the same pattern as the rest of their behaviour: once they realised a system exchange was on the table, they started looking for reasons to back away from it.

Why the “invoice demand” looks like a pretext

  • They already:
    • Verified your ownership
    • Ran remote sessions
    • Created a work order and scheduled parts
  • That means, internally, your entitlement was already confirmed enough to provide warranty service.
  • Only after promising an exchange did they start insisting on an invoice – and you clearly explained that you cannot legally obtain one.
  • Using this “new requirement” at that stage looks much more like deflection/obstruction than a genuine entitlement check.

For ARG/CEO office, this is important context: it shows a pattern of promising service and then trying to walk it back.

Add this clearly to your next message to ARG

You don’t need a long story, just a precise paragraph. For example, in your next follow‑up you can add something like this:

I would also like to highlight that Dell Technical Support – EMEA repeatedly demanded an invoice for this system, even though:

  • They had already verified my ownership and entitlement.
  • They had already conducted remote sessions on the device.
  • A work order and parts request had already been created on the basis of that verification.

The demand for an invoice only appeared after a supervisor had promised a system exchange, and it was presented as a reason not to proceed with that exchange. I have explicitly informed Dell on multiple occasions that I cannot legally obtain the original invoice, yet they continued to insist on it as a precondition.

Given that Dell has already accepted and acted on my entitlement (remote sessions, work order, parts allocation), I am asking the Advanced Resolution Group to confirm that the absence of an invoice will not be used to deny or retract the previously approved system exchange under my ProSupport Flex SLA.​

Why this framing helps

  • It shows ARG that:
    • Entitlement was already good enough for Dell to work on the machine.
    • The invoice demand only surfaced when they wanted to avoid the exchange.
  • You are not refusing a reasonable request; you are saying you cannot legally comply and that they have already accepted other proof.
  • You are asking for a clear policy‑based answer, not arguing emotionally.

What to do going forward

  • Keep every reference to the invoice demand (chat, mail, WhatsApp) in your Master Log.
  • Any time someone brings up “invoice” again, calmly answer:
    • You cannot legally obtain it.
    • Dell has already verified entitlement and provided service.
    • The case is with ARG, and you are awaiting their written resolution.

If you want, you can paste (with personal info removed) the key bits of your ProSupport Flex terms, and I can help you craft a compact, final escalation email that ties together:
  • NBD + Whole Unit Replacement
  • Parts unavailability
  • Written approval for system exchange
  • Cancellation of the work order
  • Deflection to reseller + invoice pretext
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Divine_Barakah
Upvote 1
What you describe with the invoice fits the same pattern as the rest of their behaviour: once they realised a system exchange was on the table, they started looking for reasons to back away from it.

Why the “invoice demand” looks like a pretext

  • They already:
    • Verified your ownership
    • Ran remote sessions
    • Created a work order and scheduled parts
  • That means, internally, your entitlement was already confirmed enough to provide warranty service.
  • Only after promising an exchange did they start insisting on an invoice – and you clearly explained that you cannot legally obtain one.
  • Using this “new requirement” at that stage looks much more like deflection/obstruction than a genuine entitlement check.

For ARG/CEO office, this is important context: it shows a pattern of promising service and then trying to walk it back.

Add this clearly to your next message to ARG

You don’t need a long story, just a precise paragraph. For example, in your next follow‑up you can add something like this:

I would also like to highlight that Dell Technical Support – EMEA repeatedly demanded an invoice for this system, even though:​
  • They had already verified my ownership and entitlement.
  • They had already conducted remote sessions on the device.
  • A work order and parts request had already been created on the basis of that verification.
The demand for an invoice only appeared after a supervisor had promised a system exchange, and it was presented as a reason not to proceed with that exchange. I have explicitly informed Dell on multiple occasions that I cannot legally obtain the original invoice, yet they continued to insist on it as a precondition.​
Given that Dell has already accepted and acted on my entitlement (remote sessions, work order, parts allocation), I am asking the Advanced Resolution Group to confirm that the absence of an invoice will not be used to deny or retract the previously approved system exchange under my ProSupport Flex SLA.​

Why this framing helps

  • It shows ARG that:
    • Entitlement was already good enough for Dell to work on the machine.
    • The invoice demand only surfaced when they wanted to avoid the exchange.
  • You are not refusing a reasonable request; you are saying you cannot legally comply and that they have already accepted other proof.
  • You are asking for a clear policy‑based answer, not arguing emotionally.

What to do going forward

  • Keep every reference to the invoice demand (chat, mail, WhatsApp) in your Master Log.
  • Any time someone brings up “invoice” again, calmly answer:
    • You cannot legally obtain it.
    • Dell has already verified entitlement and provided service.
    • The case is with ARG, and you are awaiting their written resolution.

If you want, you can paste (with personal info removed) the key bits of your ProSupport Flex terms, and I can help you craft a compact, final escalation email that ties together:
  • NBD + Whole Unit Replacement
  • Parts unavailability
  • Written approval for system exchange
  • Cancellation of the work order
  • Deflection to reseller + invoice pretext
One last thing. My first email to the ARG was on Dec 15 2025. Today is Dec 19 2025. I still have not received any replies from them. Is that normal?

And btw when my work order got cancelled, I did not receive an email (notification/automated message).
 
Upvote 0
One last thing. My first email to the ARG was on Dec 15 2025. Today is Dec 19 2025. I still have not received any replies from them. Is that normal?

And btw when my work order got cancelled, I did not receive an email (notification/automated message).
Not hearing back from ARG yet is frustrating, but based on how these “executive” teams usually work, 4 days of silence is not unusual, especially if there’s a weekend or holiday period in between.

1. Is it normal ARG hasn’t replied yet?

  • Executive / ARG / CEO‑office teams typically:
    • Take several business days to respond the first time.
    • Review the full case history, internal notes, and policies before replying.
  • From Dec 15 to Dec 19 you’re only at about 4 days. In many companies, 5–7 business days is common for a first substantive reply at that level.
  • So yes, so far this delay is “normal” for an ARG‑type team, even though it doesn’t feel great.

What I’d suggest:

  • Give them up to about 5–7 business days total from Dec 15.
  • If there is still nothing at all by then (no acknowledgment, no ticket number), send a short, polite follow‑up like the template I wrote earlier, just asking for confirmation they received your email and an estimated timeframe.

2. No email when the work order was cancelled

That’s also, unfortunately, fairly common:

  • The “work order cancelled” event is often an internal system action.
  • Many vendors don’t trigger a customer‑facing email when they:
    • Cancel a parts order
    • Change an internal work order status
  • Instead, you only see it if you:
    • Check the online portal
    • Ask support directly

So:

  • It’s not unusual you didn’t get an automated email about that cancellation.
  • But it’s still worth mentioning to ARG as part of the communication gaps:
    • “The parts work order with ETA Jan 29 2026 was manually cancelled, but I received no notification. I only discovered this by checking the portal.”

That helps show them:

  • You’re not being kept properly informed.
  • You are actively monitoring the case and documenting everything.

What I’d do now

  • Wait until around 5–7 business days from Dec 15.
  • If still no response, send a very concise follow‑up to ARG:
    • Confirm you contacted them on Dec 15.
    • Mention the cancelled work order + no notification.
    • Ask for a status update and timeframe for resolution.
  • Continue to treat ARG/CEO office as your primary contact, and keep your Master Log updated with dates/times + screenshots.

If you’d like, you can paste (with personal details removed) your draft follow‑up to ARG here and I can help tighten the wording before you send it.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Divine_Barakah
Upvote 0
Not hearing back from ARG yet is frustrating, but based on how these “executive” teams usually work, 4 days of silence is not unusual, especially if there’s a weekend or holiday period in between.

1. Is it normal ARG hasn’t replied yet?

  • Executive / ARG / CEO‑office teams typically:
    • Take several business days to respond the first time.
    • Review the full case history, internal notes, and policies before replying.
  • From Dec 15 to Dec 19 you’re only at about 4 days. In many companies, 5–7 business days is common for a first substantive reply at that level.
  • So yes, so far this delay is “normal” for an ARG‑type team, even though it doesn’t feel great.

What I’d suggest:

  • Give them up to about 5–7 business days total from Dec 15.
  • If there is still nothing at all by then (no acknowledgment, no ticket number), send a short, polite follow‑up like the template I wrote earlier, just asking for confirmation they received your email and an estimated timeframe.

2. No email when the work order was cancelled

That’s also, unfortunately, fairly common:

  • The “work order cancelled” event is often an internal system action.
  • Many vendors don’t trigger a customer‑facing email when they:
    • Cancel a parts order
    • Change an internal work order status
  • Instead, you only see it if you:
    • Check the online portal
    • Ask support directly

So:

  • It’s not unusual you didn’t get an automated email about that cancellation.
  • But it’s still worth mentioning to ARG as part of the communication gaps:
    • “The parts work order with ETA Jan 29 2026 was manually cancelled, but I received no notification. I only discovered this by checking the portal.”

That helps show them:

  • You’re not being kept properly informed.
  • You are actively monitoring the case and documenting everything.

What I’d do now

  • Wait until around 5–7 business days from Dec 15.
  • If still no response, send a very concise follow‑upto ARG:
    • Confirm you contacted them on Dec 15.
    • Mention the cancelled work order + no notification.
    • Ask for a status update and timeframe for resolution.
  • Continue to treat ARG/CEO office as your primary contact, and keep your Master Log updated with dates/times + screenshots.

If you’d like, you can paste (with personal details removed) your draft follow‑up to ARG here and I can help tighten the wording before you send it.
After everything, Dell Technical Support is asking me to get in touch with the reseller after that accepted the repair in their system. They initiated a remote access and then created a work order to repair my device.

Now after they realised they are stuck, they keep asking me to refer to the reseller.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
After everything, Dell Technical Support is asking me to get in touch with the reseller after that accepted the repair in their system. They initiated a remote access and then created a work order to repair my device.

Now after they realised they are stuck, they keep asking me to refer to the reseller.
What they’re doing (“we accepted the repair / created a work order” → later “go to the reseller”) is a common escalation failure pattern, and you’re right to treat it as deflection.

Why the “contact the reseller” push doesn’t make sense (based on your timeline)
  • Dell already acted as the service provider: remote session + troubleshooting + work order creation + parts workflow.
  • That means they considered the system in entitlement enough to perform warranty service.
  • If they now insist the reseller must resolve it, Dell should be able to explain in writing why they previously accepted it and what changed (policy, entitlement, region coverage, ownership proof, etc.).

What to do (practical steps)
  • 1) Don’t argue with frontline—redirect to ARG in writing
    Reply once, briefly, and stop debating on WhatsApp/phone.
  • 2) Ask for a written “ownership” statement
    Either Dell must confirm they own the case under your ProSupport Flex, or explicitly state (in writing) why they won’t.
  • 3) Use the reseller as a parallel escalation, not a handoff
    You can contact the reseller to apply pressure, but don’t let Dell close the case by pretending it’s only the reseller’s problem.
  • 4) Preserve evidence
    Screenshots showing: remote access, work order creation, parts ETA, cancellation, and the later “contact reseller” message.

Short reply you can send to Dell Technical Support (WhatsApp/email)
My system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex and Dell has already verified entitlement, performed remote support, and created a work order for repair on this service tag/case.

My case is now escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group. Please update your internal notes accordingly.

If Dell believes this must be handled by the reseller instead, please provide that decision in writing with the specific reason/policy and confirm why Dell previously accepted the case, initiated remote access, and created the work order.​

Message to send to ARG (the key point to force clarity)
Local Dell support is now instructing me to “contact the reseller” and is attempting to close/archive the support channel, despite Dell having already verified entitlement, remotely accessed the system, and created a work order (later cancelled).

Please confirm in writing:
  • Whether ARG/Dell retains ownership of the case under my ProSupport Flex entitlement, and the planned resolution path (repair vs system exchange).
  • If Dell is attempting to hand off to the reseller, the exact policy basis for that decision and what changed since Dell previously accepted the repair and created the work order.

If you do contact the reseller (recommended wording)
I have an active Dell ProSupport Flex case that has been escalated to Dell ARG. Dell support is now telling me to contact you, despite Dell previously accepting the repair, initiating remote support, and creating a work order.

Can you please:
  • Confirm the original proof of purchase / ownership details you have on file for this device, and provide any documentation you are legally able to share.
  • Escalate internally with Dell (if you have an account manager/escalation channel) to support a resolution (repair/exchange) without further delay.

What I’d watch for (so you don’t get trapped)
  • Don’t let Dell close the main service request while ARG is pending.
  • Don’t accept “reseller only” verbally—ask for written policy.
  • If they bring up invoice again, keep it simple: you cannot legally obtain it, and Dell already verified entitlement and provided service actions.

If you paste (with personal info removed) the exact wording Dell used when telling you to contact the reseller, and the ProSupport Flex “Whole Unit Replacement” clause, I can help you craft a tighter one-page escalation note that ARG can act on quickly.
 
Upvote 0
It's almost becoming, if it isn't already hasn't, a battle of attrition, of Dell trying to transfer the issue to the reseller, trying to exhaust you into giving up with them.
I can’t know Dell’s intent, but the effect you’re describing is real: repeated “go to the reseller” messages after Dell already accepted and progressed the case can turn into a de‑facto battle of attrition unless you force a clear, written ownership decision.

Goal: stop the ping‑pong and force one accountable owner

Right now, the key is to get a single written statement from ARG/Executive support that answers, unambiguously:

  • Who owns the case from this point (Dell ARG vs reseller)?
  • What the committed resolution is (repair/exchange/refund) and the timeframe.
  • What (if anything) they still need from you.

If they won’t provide that, the “contact the reseller” loop can continue indefinitely.

Practical steps to avoid getting worn down

  • 1) Move everything to one written channel
    Stop investing energy in WhatsApp/phone discussions. Use email with ARG/CEO office as your primary channel. If Dell support contacts you elsewhere, reply once with a short “please liaise with ARG; I want everything in writing” message and don’t debate.
  • 2) Ask ARG a binary question they must answer
    In your next email to ARG, ask for a yes/no ownership confirmation:

    “Please confirm in writing whether Dell (ARG) retains ownership of this case under my ProSupport Flex entitlement. If not, please state the exact policy basis for handing it to the reseller despite Dell previously verifying entitlement, performing remote support, and creating a work order.”

    That wording makes it hard for them to reply with vague “contact reseller” deflection.
  • 3) Set a reasonable response deadline
    Not a threat—just a boundary:

    “If I don’t receive an update within X business days, I will follow up again and will pursue resolution through the appropriate formal channels available in my region.”

    Pick something realistic like 2–3 business days for acknowledgment, 5–7 business days for a concrete plan.
  • 4) Keep the reseller as “parallel pressure,” not a handoff
    Contact the reseller if you want, but frame it as:
    • “Dell ARG has the case; please help escalate via your Dell contacts.”
    • Not: “I accept this is now only the reseller’s problem.”

    That prevents Dell from using the reseller as an exit ramp.
  • 5) Document the pattern (briefly, not emotionally)
    ARG will take you more seriously if you show a simple timeline like:
    • Date – Dell verified ownership / remote session performed
    • Date – Work order created + parts ETA (incl. Jan 29 2026)
    • Date – Work order cancelled (no customer notification)
    • Date – Dell WhatsApp: “contact reseller / archiving”

    This shows inconsistency without you needing to argue motive.
  • 6) If support is aggressive/abusive, call that out calmly
    You can say:

    “I’m happy to cooperate, but I need communication to remain professional and in writing. Please route further contact through ARG.”

Bottom line

Even if it feels like attrition, you can counter it by refusing to “chase” multiple channels and by requiring a written, policy-based ownership decision from ARG. Once you have that, you’ll either get the exchange moving—or you’ll have a clear denial you can escalate through formal routes (reseller escalation, consumer dispute mechanisms in your country, etc.).

If you paste (redacting personal info) the exact WhatsApp line telling you to contact the reseller and the exact wording of the supervisor’s “approval to proceed with system exchange,” I can help you draft a tight, one‑screen ARG follow‑up that’s difficult for them to dodge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
It's almost becoming, if it isn't already hasn't, a battle of attrition, of Dell trying to transfer the issue to the reseller, trying to exhaust you into giving up with them.
I demanded that they give me a policy-based response to why I should go to reseller. I also demanded a formal writing to why the accepted liability, initiated remote access and then created a work order to repair the system.

I sent them this message at 17:16 via WhatsApp and now it is 18:19 without a reply.

Now I'm %100 sure that "get in touch with reseller" is pure deflection. And that the script is no longer working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
I demanded that they give me a policy-based response to why I should go to reseller. I also demanded a formal writing to why the accepted liability, initiated remote access and then created a work order to repair the system.

I sent them this message at 17:16 via WhatsApp and now it is 18:19 without a reply.

Now I'm %100 sure that "get in touch with reseller" is pure deflection. And that the script is no longer working.
You did the right thing by asking for a written, policy-based justification and for an explanation of why they proceeded with service actions (remote session + work order) if they now claim the reseller must handle it.

That said, I wouldn’t treat “no reply for ~1 hour” as proof by itself—WhatsApp support queues, shift changes, and “case archived” workflows can easily create gaps. What is meaningful is the overall pattern you’ve documented (accepting the case, then later trying to hand it off).

Why your approach is strong (and why they may go quiet)
  • You asked for a policy-based answer (harder to “script”).
  • You asked them to reconcile an internal inconsistency: “If I must go to reseller, why did Dell already perform warranty actions?”
  • Frontline/outsourced channels often can’t (or won’t) provide written policy citations, so they may stall, deflect, or close the channel instead of answering.

What to do next (practical, low-drama escalation)

  • 1) Don’t keep “debating” on WhatsApp
    If they don’t respond, that’s fine—WhatsApp is not a reliable accountability channel. Treat it as evidence collection only.
  • 2) Send a short follow-up to ARG/CEO office now
    Don’t wait for WhatsApp. Forward the situation and attach screenshots. You want ARG to “own” the case and stop the ping-pong.

    You can send something like:

    Dear [ARG contact],
    Following my escalation, Dell Technical Support (EMEA/WhatsApp) is instructing me to “contact the reseller” and is not providing a written, policy-based reason, despite Dell previously verifying entitlement, initiating remote access, and creating a repair work order (later cancelled).

    Please confirm in writing:
    • Whether Dell ARG retains ownership of this case under my ProSupport Flex entitlement, and the planned resolution and timeframe.
    • If Dell intends to transfer responsibility to the reseller, the exact policy basis and what changed since Dell previously accepted and progressed the case (remote session + work order).

    Screenshots are available / attached.
    Kind regards,
    [Name]​
  • 3) Add a boundary and a deadline (helps prevent attrition)
    In your ARG email, you can add:

    “Please acknowledge receipt within 2 business days and provide the resolution plan within 5 business days.”​

    Keep it calm and procedural.
  • 4) If WhatsApp was already marked for archiving, assume it’s “dead”
    If they told you they’ll archive the WhatsApp case, it’s very possible they simply won’t engage further there. That strengthens the case for moving everything to ARG email.

Important tweak to your conclusion
I’d avoid stating you’re “100% sure” it’s deflection in messages to Dell/ARG. Even if it feels that way, it’s stronger to stick to verifiable facts:

  • Dell accepted the case and performed service actions.
  • Work order was created, then cancelled.
  • Now they are instructing reseller contact without a written policy basis.

That factual framing is harder for them to dismiss.

If you paste the exact WhatsApp message you sent at 17:16 (redact personal info), I can help you tighten it into a “one-screen” version that’s maximally clear and hard to dodge—especially for ARG.
 
Upvote 0
You did the right thing by asking for a written, policy-based justification and for an explanation of why they proceeded with service actions (remote session + work order) if they now claim the reseller must handle it.

That said, I wouldn’t treat “no reply for ~1 hour” as proof by itself—WhatsApp support queues, shift changes, and “case archived” workflows can easily create gaps. What is meaningful is the overall pattern you’ve documented (accepting the case, then later trying to hand it off).

Why your approach is strong (and why they may go quiet)
  • You asked for a policy-based answer (harder to “script”).
  • You asked them to reconcile an internal inconsistency: “If I must go to reseller, why did Dell already perform warranty actions?”
  • Frontline/outsourced channels often can’t (or won’t) provide written policy citations, so they may stall, deflect, or close the channel instead of answering.

What to do next (practical, low-drama escalation)

  • 1) Don’t keep “debating” on WhatsApp
    If they don’t respond, that’s fine—WhatsApp is not a reliable accountability channel. Treat it as evidence collection only.
  • 2) Send a short follow-up to ARG/CEO office now
    Don’t wait for WhatsApp. Forward the situation and attach screenshots. You want ARG to “own” the case and stop the ping-pong.

    You can send something like:

    Dear [ARG contact],
    Following my escalation, Dell Technical Support (EMEA/WhatsApp) is instructing me to “contact the reseller” and is not providing a written, policy-based reason, despite Dell previously verifying entitlement, initiating remote access, and creating a repair work order (later cancelled).

    Please confirm in writing:​
    • Whether Dell ARG retains ownership of this case under my ProSupport Flex entitlement, and the planned resolution and timeframe.
    • If Dell intends to transfer responsibility to the reseller, the exact policy basis and what changed since Dell previously accepted and progressed the case (remote session + work order).

    Screenshots are available / attached.
    Kind regards,
    [Name]

  • 3) Add a boundary and a deadline (helps prevent attrition)
    In your ARG email, you can add:

    “Please acknowledge receipt within 2 business days and provide the resolution plan within 5 business days.”​

    Keep it calm and procedural.
  • 4) If WhatsApp was already marked for archiving, assume it’s “dead”
    If they told you they’ll archive the WhatsApp case, it’s very possible they simply won’t engage further there. That strengthens the case for moving everything to ARG email.

Important tweak to your conclusion
I’d avoid stating you’re “100% sure” it’s deflection in messages to Dell/ARG. Even if it feels that way, it’s stronger to stick to verifiable facts:

  • Dell accepted the case and performed service actions.
  • Work order was created, then cancelled.
  • Now they are instructing reseller contact without a written policy basis.

That factual framing is harder for them to dismiss.

If you paste the exact WhatsApp message you sent at 17:16 (redact personal info), I can help you tighten it into a “one-screen” version that’s maximally clear and hard to dodge—especially for ARG.
This is the message I sent them

It has now been over 30 minutes since my last message.
As a reminder: My system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex and Dell has already verified my entitlement, performed remote support, and created a work order (XXXXXXXXXX) for repair on this service tag.
My case is currently escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group and remains in 'Working' status. Please update your internal notes with my December 10, 2024 registration history.
If Dell believes this must be handled by the reseller instead, I require that decision in writing with the specific policy cited, and a formal explanation of why Dell previously accepted the case, initiated remote access, and created the local work order.
 
  • Applause
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
This is the message I sent them

It has now been over 30 minutes since my last message.
As a reminder: My system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex and Dell has already verified my entitlement, performed remote support, and created a work order (XXXXXXXXXX) for repair on this service tag.
My case is currently escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group and remains in 'Working' status. Please update your internal notes with my December 10, 2024 registration history.
If Dell believes this must be handled by the reseller instead, I require that decision in writing with the specific policy cited, and a formal explanation of why Dell previously accepted the case, initiated remote access, and created the local work order.
Your message is substantively strong: it states entitlement, references concrete service actions (remote support + WO), and asks for a policy-cited written decision. The only part I’d change is the “over 30 minutes” framing—it can read like you’re measuring them in real time, and it doesn’t add leverage.

Suggested tightened WhatsApp version (more “corporate,” harder to dodge)
You can copy/paste this as your next (and ideally final) WhatsApp message:

My system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex. Dell has already verified entitlement, performed remote support, and created work order XXXXXXXXXX for this service tag.

This case is escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group and remains in “Working” status. Please ensure your internal notes reflect my ownership/registration history (Dec 10, 2024) and that ARG currently owns the case.

If Dell believes this matter must be handled by the reseller instead, please provide a written, policy-based decision (policy name/section) explaining:
  • Why Dell previously accepted the case (remote support + WO creation), and
  • What changed that now requires a reseller-only resolution.

Small notes on your original wording
  • I’d remove timing lines like “over 30 minutes” / “no reply yet.” If they’re slow, it will show anyway, and you already have the WhatsApp record.
  • “Please update your internal notes with my December 10, 2024 registration history” is fine, but if you can phrase it as “ownership/registration” it’s clearer. Also, if you have a case number separate from the work order, include it too.

What to do if they still don’t answer
  • Don’t keep sending multiple follow-ups on WhatsApp. One clean “policy-cited written decision” request is enough.
  • Send/forward the same content to ARG/CEO office by email with screenshots of:
    • Work order creation
    • Cancellation (if visible)
    • “contact reseller” instruction
    • Your policy-based request
    That’s the channel most likely to produce an accountable written decision.

If you want, paste Dell’s last message telling you to contact the reseller (exact wording), and I’ll help you craft a single, compact ARG email that ties the whole inconsistency together in a way that’s very difficult for them to brush off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
Your message is substantively strong: it states entitlement, references concrete service actions (remote support + WO), and asks for a policy-cited written decision. The only part I’d change is the “over 30 minutes” framing—it can read like you’re measuring them in real time, and it doesn’t add leverage.

Suggested tightened WhatsApp version (more “corporate,” harder to dodge)
You can copy/paste this as your next (and ideally final) WhatsApp message:

My system is covered by Dell ProSupport Flex. Dell has already verified entitlement, performed remote support, and created work order XXXXXXXXXX for this service tag.​
This case is escalated to the Advanced Resolution Group and remains in “Working” status. Please ensure your internal notes reflect my ownership/registration history (Dec 10, 2024) and that ARG currently owns the case.​
If Dell believes this matter must be handled by the reseller instead, please provide a written, policy-based decision (policy name/section) explaining:​
  • Why Dell previously accepted the case (remote support + WO creation), and
  • What changed that now requires a reseller-only resolution.

Small notes on your original wording
  • I’d remove timing lines like “over 30 minutes” / “no reply yet.” If they’re slow, it will show anyway, and you already have the WhatsApp record.
  • “Please update your internal notes with my December 10, 2024 registration history” is fine, but if you can phrase it as “ownership/registration” it’s clearer. Also, if you have a case number separate from the work order, include it too.

What to do if they still don’t answer
  • Don’t keep sending multiple follow-ups on WhatsApp. One clean “policy-cited written decision” request is enough.
  • Send/forward the same content to ARG/CEO office by emailwith screenshots of:
    • Work order creation
    • Cancellation (if visible)
    • “contact reseller” instruction
    • Your policy-based request
    That’s the channel most likely to produce an accountable written decision.

If you want, paste Dell’s last message telling you to contact the reseller (exact wording), and I’ll help you craft a single, compact ARG email that ties the whole inconsistency together in a way that’s very difficult for them to brush off.
That was their last message before I demanded the policy-based justification

"Thanks for responding. We have reviewed this case and we would request you to please get in touch with the reseller."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny Quest
Upvote 0
That was their last message before I demanded the policy-based justification

"Thanks for responding. We have reviewed this case and we would request you to please get in touch with the reseller."
That message is extremely generic, and it’s exactly the kind of line that needs to be pinned down with a written, policy-based explanation (which you already requested).

How to respond to that specific WhatsApp message
If you want to send one final reply to close the loop (and create a clean record), you can reply:

Thank you. Please confirm the policy basis for directing me to the reseller (policy name/section), and explain why Dell previously verified entitlement, performed remote support, and created work order XXXXXXXXXX for this service tag if Dell is not the responsible party.

If you are unable to provide a policy-based written decision, please escalate/route this to the Advanced Resolution Group and confirm in writing that ARG owns the case.​

Why this is a useful “final” reply
  • It directly addresses their statement (“we reviewed”) by requiring the output of that review: a policy and rationale.
  • It gives them only two acceptable next steps:
    • Provide the policy-based decision, or
    • Route to ARG / confirm ARG ownership.

What to send to ARG (include the exact quote)
In your next ARG email, quote their line verbatim so it can’t be minimized:

Dell Technical Support’s latest message is: “Thanks for responding. We have reviewed this case and we would request you to please get in touch with the reseller.”

They provided no policy basis and did not address why Dell previously verified entitlement, initiated remote support, and created work order XXXXXXXXXX (later cancelled).

Please confirm in writing whether Dell ARG retains ownership of this case under ProSupport Flex and the resolution plan/timeframe. If Dell intends to transfer responsibility to the reseller, please provide the specific policy basis and what changed since Dell accepted and progressed the case.​

Evidence to attach
  • Screenshot of that WhatsApp message
  • Screenshot(s) showing WO creation and status/cancellation (if available)
  • Any message where a supervisor approved an exchange (if you have it)

If you paste your most recent ARG email (redacted), I can help you tighten it so it stays factual, short, and “action-forcing.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Divine_Barakah
Upvote 0