Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
DrWeb Security Space 2023
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 1021137" data-attributes="member: 92939"><p>Hello and welcome to the DrWeb test!</p><p>DrWeb is an antivirus of Russian origin.</p><p>Best known for its disinfection utility, CureIT, DrWeb has never been able to catch up with its competitors, always remaining basic.</p><p>On this version 2023, DrWeb has optimized their engine and seems to have worked on the detection.</p><p></p><p>The interface of DrWeb has not changed, honestly, I find it old fashioned. I would like DrWeb to change it a bit, because it is the same interface as... 2013 !</p><p>On the detection level, we notice a slight improvement thanks to its DPH module which will intercept threats at runtime. Despite this, 2 infections manage to pass. The firewall will block the connections.</p><p></p><p>On the fake crack, the disappointment is present. I was expecting a better performance but DrWeb lets half of the downloaded droppers pass. Even if the firewall is very solid and stops the connections, I just find it a pity.</p><p></p><p>And the pack will push the nail in! DrWeb detects half of them with its engine.</p><p>At runtime, DrWeb will try to defend itself thanks to its behavioral module and DPH but this will unfortunately remain insufficient to keep a healthy machine.</p><p>The disinfection tools will detect several infections and Kaspersky one infection in memory.</p><p>DrWeb remains unfortunately ineffective, I still do not recommend it.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=odysee]id=ff66b176b45d9067445d5555804373f517b91bcc;name=DrWeb-Security-Space-2023;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FDrWeb-Security-Space-2023%3Af[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>RAM Usage : <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">High</span></p><p>Malware URL test : <span style="color: rgb(97, 189, 109)">8/10 (2 missed)</span></p><p>Fake crack : <span style="color: rgb(243, 121, 52)">0,50/1 (Half is blocked)</span></p><p>Malware Pack : <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Remaining 49 files out of 95. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">DrWeb will try to defend itself with its behavioral and DPH modules but the machine is very infected.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">It is a pity.</span></p><p>Resistance to script attacks: <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">No</span></p><p></p><p>Result :</p><p>DrWeb : 1</p><p>NPE: 14</p><p>KVRT : 23 - <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">infection in memory!</span></p><p>EEK : 6</p><p>Eset : 10</p><p></p><p>Recommand : <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">No</span></p><p>System Clean : <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">No system infected</span></p><p></p><p>[USER=96050]@Lavamate[/USER] request</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 1021137, member: 92939"] Hello and welcome to the DrWeb test! DrWeb is an antivirus of Russian origin. Best known for its disinfection utility, CureIT, DrWeb has never been able to catch up with its competitors, always remaining basic. On this version 2023, DrWeb has optimized their engine and seems to have worked on the detection. The interface of DrWeb has not changed, honestly, I find it old fashioned. I would like DrWeb to change it a bit, because it is the same interface as... 2013 ! On the detection level, we notice a slight improvement thanks to its DPH module which will intercept threats at runtime. Despite this, 2 infections manage to pass. The firewall will block the connections. On the fake crack, the disappointment is present. I was expecting a better performance but DrWeb lets half of the downloaded droppers pass. Even if the firewall is very solid and stops the connections, I just find it a pity. And the pack will push the nail in! DrWeb detects half of them with its engine. At runtime, DrWeb will try to defend itself thanks to its behavioral module and DPH but this will unfortunately remain insufficient to keep a healthy machine. The disinfection tools will detect several infections and Kaspersky one infection in memory. DrWeb remains unfortunately ineffective, I still do not recommend it. [MEDIA=odysee]id=ff66b176b45d9067445d5555804373f517b91bcc;name=DrWeb-Security-Space-2023;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FDrWeb-Security-Space-2023%3Af[/MEDIA] RAM Usage : [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]High[/COLOR] Malware URL test : [COLOR=rgb(97, 189, 109)]8/10 (2 missed)[/COLOR] Fake crack : [COLOR=rgb(243, 121, 52)]0,50/1 (Half is blocked)[/COLOR] Malware Pack : [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Remaining 49 files out of 95. DrWeb will try to defend itself with its behavioral and DPH modules but the machine is very infected. It is a pity.[/COLOR] Resistance to script attacks: [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]No[/COLOR] Result : DrWeb : 1 NPE: 14 KVRT : 23 - [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]infection in memory![/COLOR] EEK : 6 Eset : 10 Recommand : [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]No[/COLOR] System Clean : [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]No system infected[/COLOR] [USER=96050]@Lavamate[/USER] request [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top