F
ForgottenSeer 58943
Developing, maintaining and supporting security software is very expensive in the U.S., EU, Commonwealth Nations, Japan, etc. Prices for security software from companies based in those regions should be higher. At current price levels across the board, consumers are getting a whale of deal even at non-discount prices. Not to mention that publishers based in regions where their costs are lower with a depressed native currency, but price and sell in dollars and euros make a huge profit gain on the exchange rate. So they can afford to undercut the market because they are making out anyway.
The price of enterprise security softs should be really expensive. The associated sales, maintenance and support costs are extremely high.
No one complains about Adobe Acrobat at $179.99 per year or $14.99 per month for a single seat license - and that soft flies off the shelves. Adobe sells it across the world on a large scale to both home users and enterprises. The importance of a security soft and the associated costs to the publisher are much higher compared to a PDF soft.
This example just goes to show where peoples' priorities lie.
I have no issue 'paying' for everything. However when their are arguably better or comparable alternatives for much less, it doesn't make much sense to me. I don't use free stuff, I like supporting developers, within reason of course. Usually money isn't a factor for me, but there better be a compelling reason for me to buy something for 5 times more or tend to consider it bad business or reckless price gouging.