App Review Emsisoft Anti-Malware Home 2025

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
Shadowra

Shadowra

Level 41
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
High Reputation
Forum Veteran
Sep 2, 2021
3,055
39,187
3,980
29
France
Emsisoft is a New Zealand-based security solution provider that is well known to the general public.
Formerly known as A-Squared and running on Ikarus, Emsisoft has been using Bitdefender's engine in addition to its own since 2014.
The security solution has evolved significantly over the years to adapt to current threats.
Let's see how it performs in testing.



Interface :

The Emsisoft interface has not changed but remains simple and consistent.
It is still a little technical in some respects, but the publisher does its best to guide users who are confused by the rules or settings.
I installed its extension.
The solution consumes a lot of RAM, but the PC remains fluid.

Web protection: 10/10
All links are blocked.

Fake crack : 1/1
Blocked

Malware Pack : Remaining 33 threats out of 143
I expected better behavioral blocking.
Emsisoft is still an excellent scanner, but its behavioral blocking has become much less reliable.
The machine becomes severely infected and is ultimately destroyed by GDI malware that modifies the MBR, blocking all actions.
Really disappointed.

Final scan : PC destroyed

Final opinion:

Emsisoft remains an excellent scanner, no complaints there.
Its web protection is also very effective, performing flawlessly.
However, its behavioral protection needs a major overhaul: several malware programs, such as scripts and RATs, slipped through undetected.
Worse still, a GDI malware program got through and destroyed the system.
Emsisoft remains a good antivirus program, but one that should be used with caution.
If you are a high-risk user, Emsisoft is not for you.
 
If you are a high-risk user, Emsisoft is not for you.
So, Emsisoft isn't for me, it's a sinking ship, because I'm a very high-risk user.☢️ :D BTW Thanks for the video. It was great to watch your video, great soundtrack, pleasant to listen to and selected as always. Now, I hope you enjoy your vacation 🏖 , have lots of fun, and also get plenty of rest during your vacation. ;) 💯🏆
 
Great to see it tested again, sad to see it's going down hill in terms of proteciton. I had been considering paying for it again but sounds like I'll give it a miss.
So far my MD/DefenderUI/CyberLock setup is working fine though I've not come across any malware.

Anyway, thanks again for another test, your epic :D
 
Great to see it tested again, sad to see it's going down hill in terms of proteciton. I had been considering paying for it again but sounds like I'll give it a miss.
So far my MD/DefenderUI/CyberLock setup is working fine though I've not come across any malware.

Anyway, thanks again for another test, your epic :D

Add an imaging app, and you'd be good to go. That's pretty much my setup too.
 
Interesting, sad to see. Thanks for the test, though. From what I read somewhere, Emsisoft is focusing more on on-device analysis/detection vs other antiviruses which have been moving more towards the cloud. One benefit is that it sends a lot less to HQ, for better privacy. But the downside is that detections could be less reliable, which seems to be the case here.

Unless they improve their engine, I won't be using them anytime soon.
 
Interesting, sad to see. Thanks for the test, though. From what I read somewhere, Emsisoft is focusing more on on-device analysis/detection vs other antiviruses which have been moving more towards the cloud. One benefit is that it sends a lot less to HQ, for better privacy. But the downside is that detections could be less reliable, which seems to be the case here.

Unless they improve their engine, I won't be using them anytime soon.
This “privacy” is a masquerade for Emsisoft to increase revenue per license, by investing little to nothing (if BD updates are not proxied) in cloud architecture. This is then presented as “privacy preservation”. But does it do the job?

On device analysis are limited, the solution needs to take a decision in milliseconds with minimum performance impact. So that’s the result of on-device.
 
This “privacy” is a masquerade for Emsisoft to increase revenue per license, by investing little to nothing (if BD updates are not proxied) in cloud architecture. This is then presented as “privacy preservation”. But does it do the job?

On device analysis are limited, the solution needs to take a decision in milliseconds with minimum performance impact. So that’s the result of on-device.
I agree, I much prefer a cloud approach like McAfee, Trend Micro or ESET, etc.
 
I'm afraid like F-Secure I think Emsisoft is a dead company.
F-Secure does have other redeeming features, so I wouldn't call them dead yet. Like their banking protection, being able to cut remote connections when visiting banking websites is pretty cool, and haven't seen any other antivirus yet replicate that.

But I was not a fan when they scrapped their in-house engine and now only use the Avira engine.
 
F-Secure does have other redeeming features, so I wouldn't call them dead yet. Like their banking protection, being able to cut remote connections when visiting banking websites is pretty cool, and haven't seen any other antivirus yet replicate that.
The reason why they don’t replicate that (even if something is patented there are many ways to do the same and effectively go around the patent) is:

It has not been proven to work. When malware can’t connect, malware writers will implement fallback mechanisms. This may involve trying again and again on a loop, or waiting and retrying later.

It has not been proven to be needed: when antimalware has done its job, bells, whistles and doohickeys like banking protection are not needed. By the same logic, you then need to implement word document writing protection, VBE on Microsoft protection, Adobe Photoshop Editing protection, Teams Meeting protection and so on.

Yes, the browser isolation is nice to have. But it’s mainly marketing. If you do your banking on a clean system and with the legit banking site (potentially with VPN too), no additional “protections” are necessary.
 
Very sad to see Emsisoft become irrelevant in today's AV/AM/EDR market. Back in the day I used to rock it and was a huge fan but it's faded over time. And it's very sad to see it's BB become it's weakest link when it was there strongest back in the day. End of a era I guess?
Not sure how they're gonna survive having less than 50 employees globally.They've been around the industry for a while

That's too small if you compare that to the security giants like GenD,Kaspersky,McAfee,Trend,Crowdstrike ( approx 3K-10K employees ( for Sales,R&D,Support,Labs,QA etc )
Eset and BD have around 1.5K employees only.

It's hard to innovate with that small number. Thou Kaspersky was able to do it because their detection was exceptional even thou the program was buggy during it's startup days (we called them crap-persky back then).
 
The reason why they don’t replicate that (even if something is patented there are many ways to do the same and effectively go around the patent) is:

It has not been proven to work. When malware can’t connect, malware writers will implement fallback mechanisms. This may involve trying again and again on a loop, or waiting and retrying later.

It has not been proven to be needed: when antimalware has done its job, bells, whistles and doohickeys like banking protection are not needed. By the same logic, you then need to implement word document writing protection, VBE on Microsoft protection, Adobe Photoshop Editing protection, Teams Meeting protection and so on.

Yes, the browser isolation is nice to have. But it’s mainly marketing. If you do your banking on a clean system and with the legit banking site (potentially with VPN too), no additional “protections” are necessary.
I believe this tool wasn't meant for malware, but it is to help stop those remote access scammers that use AnyDesk or TeamViewer, etc to steal money from your bank accounts. Like in the movie The Beekeeper.
 
I believe this tool wasn't meant for malware, but it is to help stop those remote access scammers that use AnyDesk or TeamViewer, etc to steal money from your bank accounts. Like in the movie The Beekeeper.
They will still steal the money, because they will advise disabling F-Secure. They will notice the banking protection border.