App Review Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Premium Re-Test

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
Shadowra

Shadowra

Level 41
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
High Reputation
Forum Veteran
Sep 2, 2021
3,052
39,157
3,980
29
France
Malwarebytes is a well-known software program in the world of computer virus removal.
They’ve also offered a paid version from the start, which has evolved over time into a very comprehensive product: web filtering, attack blocking, VPN, firewall, and more.

In this version, Malwarebytes has improved certain features: the VPN is now fully managed by them, and there are some enhancements to the blocking capabilities.
Let’s take a look at that



Interface :

The interface hasn't changed, but it does include a few new features.
Malwarebytes offers a privacy tab with shortcuts to Windows services. I didn't spend much time on it during the test because, to me, it's just a gimmick.
Otherwise, everything is neatly organized by default, but Malwarebytes still doesn't enable the two settings I activated during the test....

Web protection: 10/10
All links have been blocked. The web filter is working flawlessly.

Fake crack : N/A
The sample is too old and the site that distributed it was down.
Skipped.

Malware Pack : 54 out of 126 threats remain
There have been improvements; I’d be lying if I didn’t acknowledge that.
Malwarebytes managed to block most of the traps I set for it.
But (because there’s a but), when it comes to much more insidious attacks (like the worm that flooded the memory) or attacks exploiting highly targeted security vulnerabilities, Malwarebytes isn’t up to the task on its own.
The proof is that we had a worm that flooded the memory, making it impossible to use the machine and ongoing attacks (even though Malwarebytes has blocked some C&C servers) involving memory infection by FatalRat.
As we always say: Malwarebytes alone isn't enough, and in this case, that's absolutely true.

Final scan :
Malwarebytes : 4
NPE : 6
KVRT : 6 (Infection Memory ! )

Final opinion:

Malwarebytes has some significant strengths: It’s lightweight, has excellent web filtering, and a robust database.
It can block many attacks with ease: It has successfully avoided several traps.
However, when faced with highly targeted attacks, Malwarebytes struggles to defend itself, and it shows.
It’s good, but not on its own! It’s best to pair it with another security program.

@nickstar1 request
 
Not critisizing your tests, but MBAM always gets a negative review,

When I look MBAM up in Gartner reports (the consultancy agency where everyone looks at in IT, to get the holy grail being rated into the magic quadrant which tells potential customers that a company has an excellent vision and matching capabilities to implement their vision), MBAM does well, it is just behind the champions of the SME market (Sophos, Crowdstrike, Eset and Bitdefender) in user reviews (real world experience of clients).

1780132582977.png


1780132729968.png

[

When MBAM is so bad as shown in your tests, at least some companies would have awarded them a 1 star? Their consumer products also do well in tests of independent testing organizations. Experts claim (not my words or evaluation of your tests, because I always like to watch them) that the often used gangbang video test method, does not reflect real world infection scenario's.
 
Last edited:
Not critisizing your tests, but MBAM always gets a negative review,

When I look MBAM up in Gartner reports (the consultancy agency where everyone looks at in IT, to get the holy grail being rated into the magic quadrant which tells potential customers that a company has an excellent vision and matching capabilities to implement their vision), MBAM does well, it is just behind the champions of the SME market (Sophos, Crowdstrike, Eset and Bitdefender) in user reviews (real world experience of clients).

View attachment 297890

[

When MBAM is so bad as shown in your tests, at least some companies would have awarded them a 1 start? Their consumer products also do well in tests of independent testing organizations. I don't know your testing method, but experts claim (not my words or evaluation of your tests, because I always like to watch them) the often used video gangbang test, does not reflect real world infection scenario's.

It depends on the testing methodology used
Here, I use different scenarios, such as JS/VBS attacks; I don't know if they use those :/
 
It depends on the testing methodology used
Here, I use different scenarios, such as JS/VBS attacks; I don't know if they use those :/
That is the reason why I use @Andy Ful Hard_Configurator blocking scripts in user folders and LoLBins for standard users on my wife's laptop (on top of enabling SAC and maximizing Defender with ConfigureDefender). My impression is that executables (SAC whitelist and Smartscreen worlk well nowadays for average user) are not the problem anymore, but waeponized dcuments and staged intrusions using LoLBins.

Good to know your are testing that also (y)
 
MBAM has reverted to being hot trash again. You have to wonder about those lab tests that give it 5/5 for protection. Sad.

I always liked it's web protection, it's always been very good but it's malware protection has sucked for 10 years now.

When I look MBAM up in Gartner reports (the consultancy agency where everyone looks at in IT, to get the holy grail being rated into the magic quadrant which tells potential

Gartner is bleeding money to A.I


How relevant is it anymore is the real question, yes CISO's might still use it but less and less and most are now not looking to it for advice on what to buy.