Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Written Reviews - Security and Privacy
Emsisoft Anti-Malware quick review
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dex4Sure" data-source="post: 930604" data-attributes="member: 79841"><p>The thing is... Its bad excuse from an AV vendor. Windows Defender works pretty much with whatever you run on the system. AV cannot be limiting what you can and what you can't run on the system.</p><p></p><p>Although Kaspersky does use more CPU than ESET. At least this is what I've encountered on multiple systems. Also it does use more RAM during scans. If you've got slow computer, ESET likely slows down the boot up more since it performs start up scan at system boot while Kaspersky does not. However I think after that tables switch as ESET uses less CPU for scanning. So when you open programs, copy files etc ESET should have lesser impact on system performance. Both have HTTPS scanning enabled by default, but ESET's implementation uses less CPU as well. I'd turn that off for both though. But yes, Kaspersky is among the lightest overall as well. Considering Kaspersky also has behavior blocker that makes it all the more impressive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dex4Sure, post: 930604, member: 79841"] The thing is... Its bad excuse from an AV vendor. Windows Defender works pretty much with whatever you run on the system. AV cannot be limiting what you can and what you can't run on the system. Although Kaspersky does use more CPU than ESET. At least this is what I've encountered on multiple systems. Also it does use more RAM during scans. If you've got slow computer, ESET likely slows down the boot up more since it performs start up scan at system boot while Kaspersky does not. However I think after that tables switch as ESET uses less CPU for scanning. So when you open programs, copy files etc ESET should have lesser impact on system performance. Both have HTTPS scanning enabled by default, but ESET's implementation uses less CPU as well. I'd turn that off for both though. But yes, Kaspersky is among the lightest overall as well. Considering Kaspersky also has behavior blocker that makes it all the more impressive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top