Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dex4Sure" data-source="post: 931009" data-attributes="member: 79841">Well... Emsisoft uses more both RAM and virtual RAM for me.[ATTACH=full]254329[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]254331[/ATTACH]Private bytes left, working set right (displayed by process explorer). I mean ESET uses a lot less of both virtual and physical RAM. Can&#039;t really get away from it. If you look at combined usage of RAM and virtual RAM of all those Emsisoft processes, we&#039;re looking at like over 1.3GB usage if my quick math doesn&#039;t fail me... While ESET is using just about 250MB of RAM and virtual RAM combined in contrast.I gave Emsisoft last try this time also just letting it sit idle for few hours when I was afk (this screenshot BTW was taken on the last Emsisoft try and ESET screenshot just now as I&#039;m using it). RAM usage had dropped at lowest to around 170MB according to task manager. The moment I launched a game it shot back up over 350MB instantly. Probably if I had started couple other programs on the side it would have been over 500MB again, but I just grew tired and uninstalled it one last time.And its not just high memory usage, it is also higher CPU usage. Monitoring this time TW: Warhammer 2 by starting it up 3 times netted about 15-17% CPU usage spike for Emsisoft each time. Windows Defender topped at around 8%. ESET peaked at about 7% as well this time on the first launch. However on 2nd and 3rd launches both WD and ESET barely used any CPU, while Emsisoft kept using the same amount each time...I do wonder how much it was actually using virtual RAM on top of physical RAM when it was using 1.7GB. Didn&#039;t realize to check with process explorer that time <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😂" title="Face with tears of joy&nbsp; &nbsp; :joy:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f602.png" data-shortname=":joy:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dex4Sure, post: 931009, member: 79841"] Well... Emsisoft uses more both RAM and virtual RAM for me. [ATTACH type="full" alt="Screenshot 2021-02-17 155526.png"]254329[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" alt="Screenshot 2021-02-18 170747.png"]254331[/ATTACH] Private bytes left, working set right (displayed by process explorer). I mean ESET uses a lot less of both virtual and physical RAM. Can't really get away from it. If you look at combined usage of RAM and virtual RAM of all those Emsisoft processes, we're looking at like over 1.3GB usage if my quick math doesn't fail me... While ESET is using just about 250MB of RAM and virtual RAM combined in contrast. I gave Emsisoft last try this time also just letting it sit idle for few hours when I was afk (this screenshot BTW was taken on the last Emsisoft try and ESET screenshot just now as I'm using it). RAM usage had dropped at lowest to around 170MB according to task manager. The moment I launched a game it shot back up over 350MB instantly. Probably if I had started couple other programs on the side it would have been over 500MB again, but I just grew tired and uninstalled it one last time. And its not just high memory usage, it is also higher CPU usage. Monitoring this time TW: Warhammer 2 by starting it up 3 times netted about 15-17% CPU usage spike for Emsisoft each time. Windows Defender topped at around 8%. ESET peaked at about 7% as well this time on the first launch. However on 2nd and 3rd launches both WD and ESET barely used any CPU, while Emsisoft kept using the same amount each time... I do wonder how much it was actually using virtual RAM on top of physical RAM when it was using 1.7GB. Didn't realize to check with process explorer that time 😂 [/QUOTE]

Verification