which one has the better Behaviour blocker?
The one about KIS not starting even reinstall may be because of HMP.A beta.Kaspersky Internet Security with maximum settings protects you better but has many bugs. The last week one user couldn't start Kaspersky - even with a reinstall. Yesterday one user couldn't start Kaspersky because of patching it...
that's just wrong on so many levels. you call them bugs but they're all related to other conflicting software..Kaspersky Internet Security with maximum settings protects you better but has many bugs. The last week one user couldn't start Kaspersky - even with a reinstall. Yesterday one user couldn't start Kaspersky because of patching it...
last independent tests show the Emsisoft is heavier than Kaspersky..I believe both are equally good. Kaspersky better in features and emsisoft better in terms of light-weight security
I believe the user trying to patch Kaspersky was using the Beta patch C that is not for general use as it's still in beta.Kaspersky Internet Security with maximum settings protects you better but has many bugs. The last week one user couldn't start Kaspersky - even with a reinstall. Yesterday one user couldn't start Kaspersky because of patching it...
Kaspersky Internet Security 2017, because Emsisoft is too much User Dependent.
AV-Comparatives - Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software - Real World Protection Test Overview
I love the new feature.6.4 files out of every 100 files. LOL. Anyway they implemented auto-resolve so a user will not have to make any decision.
I love the new feature.
No matter how many reminders and training a person gets he'll make a wrong decision one day. Security software should make decisions for the user to overcome this weakness in a security system
Agree on this point on FP.I like it more when a Anti-Virus ask me what I want to do. If a Anti-Virus blocks a false positive and doesn't ask me then I need to open it and add this file to the exclusions list.
No matter how many reminders and training a person gets he'll make a wrong decision one day.
Security software should make decisions for the user to overcome this weakness in a security system
Agree that there's no 100% automated accurate and effective solution and that also applies to decision-making by humansYou cannot make a wrong decision by blocking by default. When in doubt just quarantine. After a bit of investigation and it turns out to be legit, then simply restore and re-run.
No, the user should educate themselves and\or be educated on the subject matter so as not to be entirely dependent upon a security soft to protect their system and data. A fully automatic 100 % accurate and effective solution that will protect against anything possible just ain't gonna happen. Maybe when electric sheep are real the industry might be half-way there - and just another half-millenia to go...
Interesting about making decisions. When I test my whole suite that I run, if I am presented with a decision, I always chose the wrong one. If I can do that then I know I am protected.
This is not just about protection. It's about whether, as a user, you are achieving the desired end result with the RIGHT decision.Interesting about making decisions. When I test my whole suite that I run, if I am presented with a decision, I always chose the wrong one. If I can do that then I know I am protected.
This is not just about protection. It's about whether, as a user, you are achieving the desired end result with the RIGHT decision.
If you BLOCK something which is intended to do a useful task then you make a WRONG decision! This applies similarly to QUARANTINEE something which is intending to do a useful task