- Sep 12, 2013
- 454
I agree. I am currently using it and find it easy on resources. Detection (PUP) is frustrating.
- Sep 12, 2013
- 454
when it comes to PUP detection, it gives so many false positives which is frustrating. Application setup of zonealarm, ccleaner etc just to name some where detected to be PUP.
- May 3, 2014
- 426
- Nov 15, 2012
- 1,765
- May 9, 2014
- 396
- Feb 1, 2013
- 970
Nice test!! How do you consider behavioural blocking when saying "Behavioural blocking works nice"?
I executed that left file from malware pack and ESET prevented it from starting. I delete remnants of malware pack because I don't wanna that HitmanPro detects them.
- Feb 1, 2013
- 970
In your test, I see the application error message, and no alert from ESET. What I did not understand on this?
- Nov 15, 2012
- 1,765
In Your Review While the Extraction Process, Just pause the video just show the result.
Thats my suggestion.
Thats my suggestion.
- Nov 15, 2012
- 1,765
- Nov 15, 2012
- 1,765
Instead of using Windows XP i would suggest you to use Windows 7 or Windows 8 as because many AV vendors stopped supporting Windows XP.
thank you for this review...
You welcome
In Your Review While the Extraction Process, Just pause the video just show the result.
Thats my suggestion.
Ok
.
- Feb 1, 2013
- 970
Did this do anything in your test? I did not have time to watch very cautiously.. xD
The software itself is not a PUP but bundled with unwanted program (doesn't mean they are malicious) , ccleaner used to be bundle with Chrome, etc...
- Sep 12, 2013
- 454
That is precisely my point.They should work on this to reduce such alerts. This would add on its efficiency & credibility.
Similar threads
