Deleted member 178
Because you have to take the whole attack from start to end in consideration, not a part of it...from breach to the use of malicious executable to encrypt the system (like wanacry does) .From an outsiders prospective, this whole drama seems like a few Appguard pluggers didn't like someone showing Appguard in a bad light and started going personal on VS/Dan.
sorry @Umbra ..
can't understand why people are arguing which is the best between Appguard and VS, when even Appguard dev @Lockdown said that Appguard is an Enterprise solution, and VS is clearly a Home one.
at the end of the day, as an enduser: Did VS automatically block(without adding every single ##### in a blocklist) any possible damage done through/by EternalBlue? Yes.
who cares how it did it exactly.
Did Appguard do the same? No.
If you do a 4 sprinters 400m relay race, you can't tell the winner by stopping at the 3rd sprinter...when one team best sprinter is the last one... come on...be logic.
if you just talk about only a part so don't mention AG Consumer because it doesn't kicks-in until the last step.
if he doesn't know how works AG , i have to tell him , problem is he doesn't accept my explanation, for him AG Consumer must do like VS , if not it is bad...
Things must be fair. i'm not here to win over Dan, i didnt make a video to prove AG stop an attack or not...because whatever the result, i will still use AG anyway.
Last edited by a moderator: