F secure is nice...though i'm not killing you for the above words. Hope i think can correct you
Pros: DG is no where to G data BB since G data BB works on multiple modules before flagging an alert..and has 95%+ accuracy . It is that good.. moreover it checks on a pattern of suspicious processes (say 5-6) before flagging in. Fp's from G data BB in a piece of 100 samples would be 2-3~..In most cases not even that. Check its RAP..It further proves that.
G data BB is intelligent enough to differentiate b/w normal and malicious processes even if they share similar processes / Characteristics b/w them --> Only fact made me to stay with G data for over 6 Years
Deep guard is not that matured and refined. Though its potential is a lot good now but takes a lot more time to get there.
Deep guard works on two ways : File Prevelance (70%) Behaviour monitoring (30%) ..Most importantly it lacks a boot time protection. DG only blocks the processes...no automatic removal of samples atleast in most of the cases. User has to manually remove it. I agree it suspends the malicious processes but why shouldn't delete it. Does G data works like this??
Deep guard as noted in my tests works on two way : Rare Application & Malware (Accuracy >>80%). You can check this under APP & FILE Control Hope you get my point behind it, just to share you the facts i noted on G data BB since 6 years.
Believe me or not G data removal rate is excellent not even leaves non-exe traces in the registry. G data disinfects f secure renames or quarantines the malware. I can confidenty say all these FACTS with 99% Confidence.
Correct me if wrong . Sorry for the longg post. But i think its useful
Thank you !!