Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="show-Zi" data-source="post: 972837" data-attributes="member: 69581">I thought the shutdown delay was not a problem, but a specification of this software. That&#039;s my impression.I welcome the improvement, but there is no problem, so I use it as it is.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite134" alt=":coffee:" title="Coffee&nbsp; &nbsp; :coffee:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":coffee:" />Comments on the official forum. I think there was a comment that &quot;If tamper-proof is turned off, Windows security alerts appear, so you don&#039;t have to worry about emergencies.&quot;.In that case, it seems to contradict the tamper-resistant implementation.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite134" alt=":coffee:" title="Coffee&nbsp; &nbsp; :coffee:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":coffee:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="show-Zi, post: 972837, member: 69581"] I thought the shutdown delay was not a problem, but a specification of this software. That's my impression. I welcome the improvement, but there is no problem, so I use it as it is.:):coffee: Comments on the official forum. I think there was a comment that "If tamper-proof is turned off, Windows security alerts appear, so you don't have to worry about emergencies.". In that case, it seems to contradict the tamper-resistant implementation.:unsure::coffee: [/QUOTE]

Verification