Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 1085635" data-attributes="member: 92939">F-Secure is a relatively young Finnish company.I had already tested it, but in its latest version, F-Secure has integrated AI Machine Learning detection into DeepGuard.I&#039;m quite intrigued by this, so let&#039;s have a look together...[MEDIA=odysee]id=5fb0d34984f1d0f571f704a42401e1e2db8f5fbe;name=F-Secure-TOTAL-2024-%2528Re-Test%2529;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FF-Secure-TOTAL-2024-%2528Re-Test%2529%3A5[/MEDIA]User interface :F-Secure has changed the aesthetics of its interface, which was already quite attractive.Help is also available to explain the various modules for novices.Web protection: 10/10F-Secure blocked all malicious links during the test.A very good score, thanks to high-performance, intelligent Web protection.Fake crack : 0,80/1F-Secure has blocked all installations but a CPL file is missed using rundll32.exe .Malware Pack : Remaining 17 out of 698 threats.F-Secure has a good anti-malware engine. But less so for scripts. Even if the editor does try, it&#039;s still not enough.The Machine Learning AI didn&#039;t react, but I can&#039;t blame it because it&#039;s new.There&#039;s still work to be done!Final scan :F-Secure : 0Autoruns : 2 malicious keys (KillSwitch AutoRuns)NPE : 0 (The file detected is a script used by KVRT - ignored)KVRT: 4 (Infection Memory !! )Malwarebytes : 5Emsisoft : 5Final opinion:F-Secure provides relatively good, consistent protection.However, there are still major weaknesses in the scripts as the machine is infected...There&#039;s a will and a desire to improve, and the publisher mustn&#039;t give up and continue its efforts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 1085635, member: 92939"] F-Secure is a relatively young Finnish company. I had already tested it, but in its latest version, F-Secure has integrated AI Machine Learning detection into DeepGuard. I'm quite intrigued by this, so let's have a look together... [MEDIA=odysee]id=5fb0d34984f1d0f571f704a42401e1e2db8f5fbe;name=F-Secure-TOTAL-2024-%2528Re-Test%2529;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FF-Secure-TOTAL-2024-%2528Re-Test%2529%3A5[/MEDIA] User interface : F-Secure has changed the aesthetics of its interface, which was already quite attractive. Help is also available to explain the various modules for novices. [COLOR=rgb(97, 189, 109)]Web protection: 10/10[/COLOR] F-Secure blocked all malicious links during the test. A very good score, thanks to high-performance, intelligent Web protection. [COLOR=rgb(97, 189, 109)]Fake crack : 0,80/1[/COLOR] F-Secure has blocked all installations but a CPL file is missed using rundll32.exe . [COLOR=rgb(97, 189, 109)]Malware Pack : Remaining 17 out of 698 threats.[/COLOR] F-Secure has a good anti-malware engine. But less so for scripts. Even if the editor does try, it's still not enough. The Machine Learning AI didn't react, but I can't blame it because it's new. There's still work to be done! Final scan : F-Secure : 0 Autoruns : 2 malicious keys (KillSwitch AutoRuns) NPE : 0 (The file detected is a script used by KVRT - ignored) KVRT: 4 (Infection Memory !! ) Malwarebytes : 5 Emsisoft : 5 Final opinion: F-Secure provides relatively good, consistent protection. However, there are still major weaknesses in the scripts as the machine is infected... There's a will and a desire to improve, and the publisher mustn't give up and continue its efforts. [/QUOTE]

Verification