Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="struppigel" data-source="post: 997850" data-attributes="member: 86910">How does this refute my statement <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I mean it exactly the way I wrote it. I did not say the checks are always sufficient (having no FPs is impossible). It was a reply towards &quot;all samples are blocklisted&quot;Edit:You are repeating your experiences and I feel tempted to repeat my explanations. But I already explained it as good as I can. So I will stop here before it creates a discussion circle. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="struppigel, post: 997850, member: 86910"] How does this refute my statement :) I mean it exactly the way I wrote it. I did not say the checks are always sufficient (having no FPs is impossible). It was a reply towards "[B]all[/B] samples are blocklisted" Edit: You are repeating your experiences and I feel tempted to repeat my explanations. But I already explained it as good as I can. So I will stop here before it creates a discussion circle. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification