Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 981691" data-attributes="member: 92939">With your message, you prove again that you have not seen any test.The protocols of these testing companies and mine are different.They use a more or less dated archive and do an analysis. Some use Zero-Days but the portion is quite small.On my side, all links or files are up to date.On the pack, I mix. I put a lot of Zero-Days, some dated and some old to see the reaction of the antivirus.If I decide that an Antivirus is effective, it is.And I remind again that the tests, whether it is me or others, are to be used in comparison with others and not to be based on one!NB : I don&#039;t test only signature detections <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😉" title="Winking face&nbsp; &nbsp; :wink:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" data-shortname=":wink:" />Please don&#039;t talk when you don&#039;t know please....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 981691, member: 92939"] With your message, you prove again that you have not seen any test. The protocols of these testing companies and mine are different. They use a more or less dated archive and do an analysis. Some use Zero-Days but the portion is quite small. On my side, all links or files are up to date. On the pack, I mix. I put a lot of Zero-Days, some dated and some old to see the reaction of the antivirus. If I decide that an Antivirus is effective, it is. And I remind again that the tests, whether it is me or others, are to be used in comparison with others and not to be based on one! NB : I don't test only signature detections 😉 Please don't talk when you don't know please.... [/QUOTE]

Verification