Q&A Highest compatibility privacy extention for Chromium based browsers

Discussion in 'Browsers and Extensions' started by Windows_Security, Jan 22, 2017.

  1. TerrakionSmash

    TerrakionSmash Level 16

    Nov 17, 2016
    752
    2,129
    Somewhere underwater or over water. I am water!
    Windows 10
    Microsoft
    Blocking third party cookies seem to slow down the heuristics of Privacy Badger considerably although how many it blocks is still significantly smaller than the others. Including others also slow down its heuristics.
    Maybe I could just be visiting only a few websites that time since I was too busy testing stuff to browse and read numerous sites. You could also just block sites manually in Privacy Badger since some stuff might not be needed anyway and you can just disable them.
     
  2. Windows_Security

    Windows_Security Level 13
    Content Creator Trusted

    Mar 13, 2016
    617
    2,893
    Holland
    Windows 7
    Default-Deny
    You are right, I can't change the first post anymore, but Peter Low's list with Safe Browsing does as well. So good tip
     
  3. TerrakionSmash

    TerrakionSmash Level 16

    Nov 17, 2016
    752
    2,129
    Somewhere underwater or over water. I am water!
    Windows 10
    Microsoft
    What about blocking only 3rd-party frames in uBlock Origin?
     
  4. TerrakionSmash

    TerrakionSmash Level 16

    Nov 17, 2016
    752
    2,129
    Somewhere underwater or over water. I am water!
    Windows 10
    Microsoft
    #24 TerrakionSmash, Jan 27, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2017
  5. woodrowbone

    woodrowbone Level 8

    Dec 24, 2011
    356
    560
    While on the Adblock subject, I was trying uBlock Orgin, but had problems with it as it competes with both Avast Security Online and Avira Browser Safety plugin.
    Both Avast and Avira crashes from time to time, does anyone know if they share any commons lists or servers with uBlock?
    I did not use Avast and Avira plugin at the same time as they also do not sit well together.

    /W
     
    Dirk41 likes this.
  6. ozone

    ozone Level 3

    Jan 17, 2017
    106
    263
    Earth
    haven't used Avira Browser Safety, but it has similar functions as Avast Security Online,
    so I would recommend you to disable blocking functions for both extensions (use them only as site adviser), and use uBO as main blocker


    btw filters against ransomware
    Blocklist | Ransomware Tracker
     
    HarborFront, cryogent and woodrowbone like this.
  7. woodrowbone

    woodrowbone Level 8

    Dec 24, 2011
    356
    560
    Thx ozone!
    I will try that, I feel a bit stupid that I did not think of that myself.
    I just moved from Adguard, and there were no problem with that combo.

    /W
     
  8. woodrowbone

    woodrowbone Level 8

    Dec 24, 2011
    356
    560
    Avira did not have any settings to play with, bummer...

    /W
     
  9. ozone

    ozone Level 3

    Jan 17, 2017
    106
    263
    Earth
    click on gear next to question mark
     
  10. Wave

    Wave Guest

    I am using uBlock Origin because it's just so nice and simple, I love it to bits :) <3 to the uBlock Origin team! :)
     
    Dirk41 and Zero Knowledge like this.
  11. antreas

    antreas Guest

    :DHappy to see scriptsafe users here! :rolleyes:
     
    BugCode and Oxygen like this.
  12. woodrowbone

    woodrowbone Level 8

    Dec 24, 2011
    356
    560
    Aha! Thx a lot!

    /W
     
  13. HarborFront

    HarborFront Level 34
    Content Creator

    Oct 9, 2016
    2,305
    5,771
    Far East
    #33 HarborFront, Jan 30, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2017
    Avira Browser Safety works well with uBlock Origin in my system. Yes, they do compete especially for trackers. In fact, uBlock Origin is more aggressive due to its large number of filters. But if you start to test for malicious URLs and Phishing websites (like at malc0de.net, vxvault.net etc) you'll see the difference in both.
     
    woodrowbone likes this.
  14. HarborFront

    HarborFront Level 34
    Content Creator

    Oct 9, 2016
    2,305
    5,771
    Far East
    #34 HarborFront, Jan 30, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2017
    Thanks
     
  15. Windows_Security

    Windows_Security Level 13
    Content Creator Trusted

    Mar 13, 2016
    617
    2,893
    Holland
    Windows 7
    Default-Deny
    #35 Windows_Security, Jan 31, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2017
    URL blocking is a numbers game, so you probably best of by using Chrome Safe browsing (market leader most used browser), Avast safe browsing extension (market leader of AV with most active users) and Norton ConnectSafe DNS service (being part of Symantec and Symantec being a member of the threat alliance, the largest corporate oriented URL/DNS exchange in the world).

    That is why I don't bother to use all those extra filters. Most malware URL's are only active for a few hours, so the extra safety you think those filters provide is 99,99% likely to be dead wood. I once challenged GorHill with those 'useless' community based lists and he confirmed that with his own tests he did not measure much additional blocking when he used all the lists versus Google Safe Browsing only. Imagine how useless these extra lists are when you add the number of users/endpoints of Avast and the Threat alliance to what Google sees.

    But when it feels good, ignore above post and be happy camper with all these community based dead wood lists :p
     
  16. Crypto

    Crypto Level 2

    Jan 14, 2017
    63
    186
    United States
    The three you listed are great! Nearly the best out there.
     
  17. TerrakionSmash

    TerrakionSmash Level 16

    Nov 17, 2016
    752
    2,129
    Somewhere underwater or over water. I am water!
    Windows 10
    Microsoft
    @Windows_Security But are URL blocking a suitable efficient replacement for antivirus. Maybe combined with something else just as easy?
    --From Wilderssecurity "A test of SmartScreen browser implementation alone that showed that when bombarded with 220918 malicious samples, SmartScreen blocked 99% and never allowed any of those to enter the system."
    Same chances as the ones in AV-comparatives but these samples might be older and therefore comparing to av-comparatives data, is actually less effective. But if av-comparatives can find urls to find that 97-99% of the malware were already blocked by antivirus, Microsoft/Google/Avast should just or more competently be able to do so, right? Maybe there are other threats web blocking doesn't cover.
     
  18. HarborFront

    HarborFront Level 34
    Content Creator

    Oct 9, 2016
    2,305
    5,771
    Far East
    #38 HarborFront, Jan 31, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2017
    So will I be getting the best of 3 worlds if I have Simple DNSCrypt (with a server supporting encryption and DNSSEC validation) and Norton ConnectSafe DNS which provides protection against malicious and phishing sites?

    All I need is to set in Windows is the Preferred DNS server as 127.0.0.1 and the Alternative DNS server as 199.85.126.10. Or the other way round? Am I right?

    Thanks


    FYI, I carried out tests at malc0de.net and vxvault.net with Norton ConnectSafe (disabling my other browser extensions like uBlock Origin, BitDefender TrafficLight, Web Defender and Avira Browser Safety) and found that it performs better for the former. With my extensions enabled, for the latter, they can detect and block some sites which Norton ConnectSafe failed to.

    Overall, I'll just treat Norton SafeConnect as another extension since not even it and Google Safe Browsing can block all malicious and phishing sites.
     
  19. Zero Knowledge

    Zero Knowledge Level 5

    Dec 2, 2016
    239
    692
    Dark Cloud Universe
    HarborFront do not use SimpleDnsCrypt & NortonDNS at the same time. Incompatible. You can not use DNsCrypt & Norton together at the same time. DnsCrypt encrypts your dns settings so no one can see your dns requests including your ISP. NotonDns does not encrypt your dns, Norton can see every one of your dns request and most likely collects and stores the logs of every dns request you have made.
     
    Dirk41 likes this.
  20. HarborFront

    HarborFront Level 34
    Content Creator

    Oct 9, 2016
    2,305
    5,771
    Far East
    #40 HarborFront, Feb 1, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2017
    If DNSCrypt comes first (set as Preferred) and Norton ConnectSafe DNS later (set as Alternative) would Norton SafeConnect sees my requests as encrypted or non-encrypted? What if I reverse the settings? If the requests are encrypted then they don't matter, right?
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Help Me Decide Browsers War? Which provides the highest level of protection ? Compare Apps Archive Feb 8, 2015
Auto arrange poll options by highest votes Community Feedback Dec 3, 2014
FortiClient compatibility with the Microsoft Security update of January 3, 2018 - Meltdown Other Security for Windows Jan 4, 2018