Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 996164" data-attributes="member: 92939">Hello <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />It&#039;s been a while since I tested it quickly, and I didn&#039;t like it.First of all, the speed. They are below what I can get with NordVPN, MullVad, ExpressVPN and others. Indeed, PrivateVPN relies on OpenVPN which is old and relatively heavy...Wireguard would have been better, because it is more recent, and has fewer lines of code!Then, I didn&#039;t find it as &quot;Private&quot; ...It didn&#039;t take me long to break the VPN with a web request... my real IP was displayed...Usually the VPN holds up, but it can happen.And finally, the VPN is under US jurisdiction, which makes me run away <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 996164, member: 92939"] Hello :) It's been a while since I tested it quickly, and I didn't like it. First of all, the speed. They are below what I can get with NordVPN, MullVad, ExpressVPN and others. Indeed, PrivateVPN relies on OpenVPN which is old and relatively heavy... Wireguard would have been better, because it is more recent, and has fewer lines of code! Then, I didn't find it as "Private" ... It didn't take me long to break the VPN with a web request... my real IP was displayed... Usually the VPN holds up, but it can happen. And finally, the VPN is under US jurisdiction, which makes me run away :) [/QUOTE]

Verification