Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rashmi" data-source="post: 1077093" data-attributes="member: 107361"><p>Decent signatures, dumb behavior blocking, false-positives prone, buggy, frequent Chrome extension errors, extremely unreliable parental control on Windows, and an illogical and lazy team. If you ask them for password protection or parental control protection, their (stupid) response is to use the Windows Standard Account. The parental control heavily relies on browser extensions, which kids can easily disable in the Windows Standard Account. The Chrome extension frequently errors out, which leads to partial protection and access to inappropriate websites. Even when the Chrome extension works, the blocking of inappropriate websites is very unreliable. I don&#039;t use it now, but I just tested for any improvements. The issues are still there after over a year: Chrome extension error, unreliable blocking of inappropriate websites (didn&#039;t block popular social media or streaming networks that its Android version blocks with the same child profile), and nothing happens when you click on Allow Website. Its Android version doesn&#039;t even have &quot;exclusions&quot; to allow blocked websites (you have to disable the category to access a blocked website). It&#039;s been over a year since users requested the feature.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="rashmi, post: 1077093, member: 107361"] Decent signatures, dumb behavior blocking, false-positives prone, buggy, frequent Chrome extension errors, extremely unreliable parental control on Windows, and an illogical and lazy team. If you ask them for password protection or parental control protection, their (stupid) response is to use the Windows Standard Account. The parental control heavily relies on browser extensions, which kids can easily disable in the Windows Standard Account. The Chrome extension frequently errors out, which leads to partial protection and access to inappropriate websites. Even when the Chrome extension works, the blocking of inappropriate websites is very unreliable. I don't use it now, but I just tested for any improvements. The issues are still there after over a year: Chrome extension error, unreliable blocking of inappropriate websites (didn't block popular social media or streaming networks that its Android version blocks with the same child profile), and nothing happens when you click on Allow Website. Its Android version doesn't even have "exclusions" to allow blocked websites (you have to disable the category to access a blocked website). It's been over a year since users requested the feature. [/QUOTE]

Verification