Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="show-Zi" data-source="post: 964854" data-attributes="member: 69581">In the case of watermarks, I think it&#039;s a method of blurring and cheating by mosaic instead of deleting. If so, you can do it with free video editing software. I did that with shotcut several times. I think it may be better not to process the watermark if it covers the subject, as it will leave a feeling of strangeness.<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="📹" title="Video camera&nbsp; &nbsp; :video_camera:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f4f9.png" data-shortname=":video_camera:" />Editing videos is a lot of fun. The order in which filters are applied is similar to the concept of a firewall in comodo.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="show-Zi, post: 964854, member: 69581"] In the case of watermarks, I think it's a method of blurring and cheating by mosaic instead of deleting. If so, you can do it with free video editing software. I did that with shotcut several times. I think it may be better not to process the watermark if it covers the subject, as it will leave a feeling of strangeness.📹 Editing videos is a lot of fun. The order in which filters are applied is similar to the concept of a firewall in comodo.:) [/QUOTE]

Verification