Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="oldschool" data-source="post: 905013" data-attributes="member: 71262">[USER=59691]@SecureKongo[/USER] Brave has &quot;junk&quot; like Rewards but it may be disabled to your liking. See my <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/brave-browser-feature-review-release-v-1-3-115-windows.98535/" target="_blank">Brave feature review</a> thread.&nbsp; Brave is updated frequently and they continue to make improvements to adblocking and fingerprinting protections. These functions are best handled by the browser itself, and not extensions, thus making Brave a commendable choice.And please realize, that all of these testing websites use completely different data points/sets and all of these tests suffer from data-input pollution. This renders them very tenuous in terms of their value to web users. And very few users even know about or bother to protect against fingerprinting You may read more along these lines <a href="https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions" target="_blank">here</a>.This, indeed, which speaks to my point above.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="oldschool, post: 905013, member: 71262"] [USER=59691]@SecureKongo[/USER] Brave has "junk" like Rewards but it may be disabled to your liking. See my [URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/brave-browser-feature-review-release-v-1-3-115-windows.98535/']Brave feature review[/URL] thread. Brave is updated frequently and they continue to make improvements to adblocking and fingerprinting protections. These functions are best handled by the browser itself, and not extensions, thus making Brave a commendable choice. And please realize, that all of these testing websites use completely different data points/sets and all of these tests suffer from data-input pollution. This renders them very tenuous in terms of their value to web users. And very few users even know about or bother to protect against fingerprinting You may read more along these lines [URL='https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions']here[/URL]. This, indeed, which speaks to my point above. [/QUOTE]

Verification