Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
In terms of prevention, desinfection of performance who is better ¿kaspersky plus or bitdefender total security?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aktiffiso" data-source="post: 1092319" data-attributes="member: 11939"><p>Hello, sorry, but it seems we have different schedules. I like to see her responses because I learn and reflect. There are some points that I would like to ask 1.- What these security solutions really have, because sometimes I think that companies exaggerate the characteristics of their solutions. For example, bitdefender may say that it has a cryptocurrency protection module, but does not specify how it works, while Kaspersky does tell you that this protection is carried out through "Behavioral monitoring, firewall traffic monitoring and malicious link interception based on various listings (more blacklists, more browser resources and slower browsing)". In other words, for me Bitdefender is ready to use but sometimes it lies saying that it has dedicated features when really what it does is put an indicator on something that was already done by default, or in other words I doubt that the protection module really Bitdefender's cryptocurrency counter works differently from Kaspersky's combination of protection modules, what happens is that each company presents it at its convenience. 2. There are two questions that arise for me: a) Which one reacts faster to viruses? For example, I know that there are antiviruses that detect viruses as soon as they reach the system and others that do so when they are executed. b) I remember that bitdefender reacted slower to viruses than kaspersky, since bitdefender detected them when I opened the folder where the virus was, while kaspersky did not even let it enter my system. I am right? 3.- Is customization really necessary? The question is because as I see, Kaspersky's configuration options in its complete analysis cover more files than Bitdefender, since apparently the latter only analyzes new and modified files, in general In this sense, the default configuration of both solutions is not the one that should be used for a comparison and in that case my question is, if the same configurations as Bitdefender's, which only analyzes new and modified ones, are used, will Kaspersky's capabilities not be reduced? ? 4.- Do you really think it is important to consider the geopolitical problem? I am not from the United States, I am from Latin America.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aktiffiso, post: 1092319, member: 11939"] Hello, sorry, but it seems we have different schedules. I like to see her responses because I learn and reflect. There are some points that I would like to ask 1.- What these security solutions really have, because sometimes I think that companies exaggerate the characteristics of their solutions. For example, bitdefender may say that it has a cryptocurrency protection module, but does not specify how it works, while Kaspersky does tell you that this protection is carried out through "Behavioral monitoring, firewall traffic monitoring and malicious link interception based on various listings (more blacklists, more browser resources and slower browsing)". In other words, for me Bitdefender is ready to use but sometimes it lies saying that it has dedicated features when really what it does is put an indicator on something that was already done by default, or in other words I doubt that the protection module really Bitdefender's cryptocurrency counter works differently from Kaspersky's combination of protection modules, what happens is that each company presents it at its convenience. 2. There are two questions that arise for me: a) Which one reacts faster to viruses? For example, I know that there are antiviruses that detect viruses as soon as they reach the system and others that do so when they are executed. b) I remember that bitdefender reacted slower to viruses than kaspersky, since bitdefender detected them when I opened the folder where the virus was, while kaspersky did not even let it enter my system. I am right? 3.- Is customization really necessary? The question is because as I see, Kaspersky's configuration options in its complete analysis cover more files than Bitdefender, since apparently the latter only analyzes new and modified files, in general In this sense, the default configuration of both solutions is not the one that should be used for a comparison and in that case my question is, if the same configurations as Bitdefender's, which only analyzes new and modified ones, are used, will Kaspersky's capabilities not be reduced? ? 4.- Do you really think it is important to consider the geopolitical problem? I am not from the United States, I am from Latin America. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
