Chiron
Level 1
- Feb 24, 2011
- 250
Dejan said:Meh, iObit.
Yep, I'll never trust a single product of theirs again after what they did to Malwarebytes.
Dejan said:Meh, iObit.
umbrapolaris said:I don't know all the details but how come MBAM database can fall easily into Iobit hands...
HeffeD said:umbrapolaris said:I don't know all the details but how come MBAM database can fall easily into Iobit hands...
Because it's in the hands of every MBAM user... I have a copy. If you use MBAM, you also have a copy.
I'm not sure if the local database is encrypted or obfuscated, but since it's on your machine, you can spent as much time as you want trying to read it.
Changelog:
+ Added "Privacy Sweep" support for the latest version of frequently-used software:
Opera 11.6; Safari 5.1; K-Lite Codec Pack 8.00 (Full); FoxiReader 5.1; Silverlight 5.0; Xfire 1.141; Yahoo messenger 11.5; KMPlayer 3.1; Utorrent 3.1.
+ Added "Performance Monitor"
+ Added IObit Uninstaller v2.1
+ Enhanced support for Windows 8
+ Enhanced real-time optimization of ActiveBoost
+ Enhanced filtering features for the cookies of frequently-used websites
+ Enhanced registry scan
+ Enhanced detection feature for SSD (Solid State Drive)
+ Enhanced Smart RAM, Process Manager and Turbo Boost
+ Improved UI
* Fixed General bugs
Could people stop bringing this up every time their name is mentioned? :\Chiron said:Dejan said:Meh, iObit.
Yep, I'll never trust a single product of theirs again after what they did to Malwarebytes.
Chiron said:Dejan said:Meh, iObit.
Yep, I'll never trust a single product of theirs again after what they did to Malwarebytes.
Littlebits said:Believe me there is other security and software vendors that have did far worse than IObit and still continue to do it now. Anyone who keeps up with software news knows about these other big-name controversial vendors.
Chiron said:Littlebits said:Believe me there is other security and software vendors that have did far worse than IObit and still continue to do it now. Anyone who keeps up with software news knows about these other big-name controversial vendors.
I'm curious, who are these other vendors? Can you please provide links?
MrXidus said:Changelog:
+ Added "Privacy Sweep" support for the latest version of frequently-used software:
Opera 11.6; Safari 5.1; K-Lite Codec Pack 8.00 (Full); FoxiReader 5.1; Silverlight 5.0; Xfire 1.141; Yahoo messenger 11.5; KMPlayer 3.1; Utorrent 3.1.
+ Added "Performance Monitor"
+ Added IObit Uninstaller v2.1
+ Enhanced support for Windows 8
+ Enhanced real-time optimization of ActiveBoost
+ Enhanced filtering features for the cookies of frequently-used websites
+ Enhanced registry scan
+ Enhanced detection feature for SSD (Solid State Drive)
+ Enhanced Smart RAM, Process Manager and Turbo Boost
+ Improved UI
* Fixed General bugs
Littlebits said:Chiron said:Littlebits said:Believe me there is other security and software vendors that have did far worse than IObit and still continue to do it now. Anyone who keeps up with software news knows about these other big-name controversial vendors.
I'm curious, who are these other vendors? Can you please provide links?
You can Google links if available, I'm not going to waste my time searching for them.
Some of the most know controversial actions known by venders is the following:
Sony- installed malware rootkits to systems not detected by any security solution at the time.
Microsoft had to release a critical update to remove the infection.
But even after that how many of you all still use Sony products? Like PlayStation, televisions, recordable DVD's & CD's, stereos, etc.
Microsoft- back when Windows was first released, they were accused of stealing intellectual properties of Apple. There probably isn't much info online about it because the differences were dealt with behind closed doors, probably a huge payoff. Some of the older users might remember the deal. Still even the users who know about the situation still continue to use Microsoft products. Of coarse there are many more Microsoft controversies involving stealing other copyrighted content, privacy issues, etc.
CheckPoint- Added scareware marketing messages to ZoneAlarm products making users think that they were infected.
Avira and Uniblue partnership.
Google- allowing malicious ads in their recommendations and many privacy issues.
AOL and AT&T- Way too many issues to list, do research.
Facebook- many privacy concerns and security issues, you can read another issue almost every week if you follow the news.
Symantec- a really evil company, but makes excellent products. Do research...
Do I really need to mention Comodo?
Those are the ones that can can remember off the top of my head but there are many more.
Maybe a new thread can be created "Most Controversial Software Companies" where users can add links and their commits.
Thanks.
Prorootect said:.
I think we have here the different degrees of severity and in different cases.
For me a stealer is a stealer. Black on white, no doubt.
So - that each one will ask itself a question of morality, which is very simple: to help or not help a stealer?
Littlebits said:Microsoft- back when Windows was first released, they were accused of stealing intellectual properties of Apple.
Littlebits said:Do I really need to mention Comodo?
biozfear said:It was confirmed on another thread that version 5 was leaked prior to CNET and other sites having it updated.
I would do a video review, but I would need some help for it. I run it on VMWARE and did some tests. I don't mind testing it again and record it, but I will need to know some decent freeware to record and some tips on recording.
I could try to get the Pro version since I know a friend of mine has version 4 Pro and he has probably updated to version 5.
There's some small differences that are only available on Pro version despite being listed on the GUI (or UI) of the Free version.