Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nevi" data-source="post: 889432" data-attributes="member: 51565"><p>I think most people will first notice WDs resource use, if they go from something real light as Eset. Personally I think WD use plenty of resources, but I am used to very light AV apps. But I have seen others talk about it. I remember a test The PC Security Channel made, where Leo came to the conclusion that it actually used a nice chunk of resources. You can see it here.</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]kQCZGckHA8s:7[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nevi, post: 889432, member: 51565"] I think most people will first notice WDs resource use, if they go from something real light as Eset. Personally I think WD use plenty of resources, but I am used to very light AV apps. But I have seen others talk about it. I remember a test The PC Security Channel made, where Leo came to the conclusion that it actually used a nice chunk of resources. You can see it here. [MEDIA=youtube]kQCZGckHA8s:7[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
