Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bayasdev" data-source="post: 889570" data-attributes="member: 41799"><p>WD on-access scan uses way too much resources (CPU and I/O) if you have a folder full of EXEs nor run an unknown program, otherwise is pretty light. WD in W10 2004 gave me memory leaks of up to 800mb of RAM, LTSC was consistent between 150-220mb RAM usage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bayasdev, post: 889570, member: 41799"] WD on-access scan uses way too much resources (CPU and I/O) if you have a folder full of EXEs nor run an unknown program, otherwise is pretty light. WD in W10 2004 gave me memory leaks of up to 800mb of RAM, LTSC was consistent between 150-220mb RAM usage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
