Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 893031" data-attributes="member: 32260">But, you can easily end it.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />That is not proven hypothesis (maybe true and maybe not). I tested WD several times and the main performance issue is not related to WD I/O and remains the same on SSD devices. As you correctly noticed, it is simply not especially visible when using SSD.I do not see massive emotions here. Some emotions are welcome to keep the thread alive. Simply, the off-topic long discussions bloat the thread.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 893031, member: 32260"] But, you can easily end it.:) That is not proven hypothesis (maybe true and maybe not). I tested WD several times and the main performance issue is not related to WD I/O and remains the same on SSD devices. As you correctly noticed, it is simply not especially visible when using SSD. I do not see massive emotions here. Some emotions are welcome to keep the thread alive. Simply, the off-topic long discussions bloat the thread.(y) [/QUOTE]

Verification