Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Local Host" data-source="post: 968176"><p>Is extremely simple, all this tests are useless, is extremely easy to write lines of codes to pass testing, that would make the program useless in the real world.</p><p></p><p>Pretty much how all those AD-Blocker tests work, they simply block the testing page, same applies to malware testing in this case, they using simple malware that in no way replicates how Home Users get infected.</p><p></p><p>Nowadays most people just get their browser hijacked, and there's nothing WD will do prevent that (Kasperksy on the other hand can detect and rollback the changes).</p><p></p><p>Cars are constantly compared, but they don't compare to one another, either way, even car testing is optimized for specific scenarions, and there's a good chunk of cars out there that will kill you in a crash.</p><p></p><p>I never claimed anywhere video testing is the holy grail, nor that they aren't biased either, if anything I claimed exactly the opposite, and I not wasting time arguing on that.</p><p></p><p>Simple, always using the home environment excuse for WD short comings and saying is enough, fact remains third party AVs are superior to WD still,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Local Host, post: 968176"] Is extremely simple, all this tests are useless, is extremely easy to write lines of codes to pass testing, that would make the program useless in the real world. Pretty much how all those AD-Blocker tests work, they simply block the testing page, same applies to malware testing in this case, they using simple malware that in no way replicates how Home Users get infected. Nowadays most people just get their browser hijacked, and there's nothing WD will do prevent that (Kasperksy on the other hand can detect and rollback the changes). Cars are constantly compared, but they don't compare to one another, either way, even car testing is optimized for specific scenarions, and there's a good chunk of cars out there that will kill you in a crash. I never claimed anywhere video testing is the holy grail, nor that they aren't biased either, if anything I claimed exactly the opposite, and I not wasting time arguing on that. Simple, always using the home environment excuse for WD short comings and saying is enough, fact remains third party AVs are superior to WD still, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top